On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:44:33PM -0100, Carlos Silva wrote
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > I'm not a C programmer, let alone a developer, so this may be a stupid
> > question, but here goes... has anyone ever tried doing a HAL (Hardware
> > Abstraction Layer) to pre
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
> and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
> packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers
> goes MIA so we can find an a
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:28:58 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/03/13 19:24, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
> > hasufell wrote:
> >
> >> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
> >
> > Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
>
> Yet that is exactly what IUSE=va
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:21:36 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> >> you are called with ABI=sth argv[0] = your name
> >
> > I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
> > on argv[0] is a p
Michał Górny schrieb:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
>>> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>>
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> What
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > What do we need that wrappe
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
>> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does
it ju
Walter Dnes posted on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:28:50 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:07PM -0500, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
>
>> I am sorry that this package has been such a headache for you,
>> unfortunately binary drivers (especially) are often like that. Thanks
>> for all yo
On 03/03/13 19:24, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
hasufell wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
Yet that is exactly what IUSE=vanilla is designed for... ;-)
On 03/03/13 16:42, hasufell wrote:
On 03/03/2013 08:11 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
There was a big ole' chat on #gentoo-dev regarding this. My
understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
Kernels > 3.4 are not
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:28 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:07PM -0500, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
>
> > I am sorry that this package has been such a headache for you,
> > unfortunately binary drivers (especially) are often like that. Thanks
> > for all your hard work
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I'm not a C programmer, let alone a developer, so this may be a stupid
> question, but here goes... has anyone ever tried doing a HAL (Hardware
> Abstraction Layer) to present a reasonably stable interface to binary
> video drivers? Think of
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:07PM -0500, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
> I am sorry that this package has been such a headache for you,
> unfortunately binary drivers (especially) are often like that. Thanks
> for all your hard work keeping this usable.
I'm not a C programmer, let alone a dev
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Starting as a developer or aspiring to become one with that
>> attitude is not acceptable.
>
> That doesn't make sense to me.
>
> If the reason is good, surely it does not matter who is doing the breaking?
Well ther
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Starting as a developer or aspiring to become one with that
> attitude is not acceptable.
That doesn't make sense to me.
If the reason is good, surely it does not matter who is doing the breaking?
//Peter
pgpvkacjjiVYz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:39:16 -0600
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
> scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
> gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
> doing with my involvement in x
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does
> > > it just rely on custom 'ABI' varia
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:39:42 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> The wrapper is already in a seperate package [1], the currently active
> and tested version (1.0) is in bash, also there is a (currently
> masked) version 2.0 written by binki in C doing the same natively. So
> you even have a choice in wha
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 03:19:17 schrieb Peter Stuge:
>
> > > Again, I guess you have to make Mike go away now.
> >
> > I never said that so please just stop it.
>
> You threatened to preempt me if I wanted to become a developer and
> found his practise OK - meaning that the behavior is unacceptab
19 matches
Mail list logo
