> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Robin H Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:57:10PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> Over in #gentoo-dev we've been discussing the need for a new license
>> for OpenSMTPD (currently in my overlay [1]).
>>
>> What do we call it, and should it be included, or i
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:57:10PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Over in #gentoo-dev we've been discussing the need for a new license
> for OpenSMTPD (currently in my overlay [1]).
>
> What do we call it, and should it be included, or is it already
> covered by another license
On 2013.02.28 02:14, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
> @neddyseagoon: Yeah it would be great to have it back, I think the
> day
> should remain as is. Every first Saturday of every month. Thanks.
[snip]
Pavlos,
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-952608.html
Poke me the weekend before bugday and I'll d
>From now we are have and an event g+ page :
https://plus.google.com/events/cnevit57nm91ulji4bj4vt7910s :)
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 28.02.2013 01:30, Peter Stuge пишет:
>> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>> his sole two bugs
>>
>> Is there a rule in Gentoo that forbids a dev to
This allows us to spawn 'tee' as separate process while keeping
the function code executed in the main shell.
---
gx86/eclass/multibuild.eclass | 29 +++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gx86/eclass/multibuild.eclass b/gx86/eclass/multibuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2013 09:30 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> 4) Introduced a DISABLE_MULTILIB variable for use of
>> portage-multilib, which will disable all multilib related stuff.
>> I am not sure if that's what they want, but I heard something
>> like that. To
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:09:15 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > This allows us to spawn 'tee' as separate process while keeping
> > the function code executed in the main shell.
>
> Can you explain why this is 'better'? I'd prefer way more
> docu
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> This allows us to spawn 'tee' as separate process while keeping
> the function code executed in the main shell.
Can you explain why this is 'better'? I'd prefer way more
documentation in the code itself. You are using a number of what I'd
con
Hi folks,
Over in #gentoo-dev we've been discussing the need for a new license
for OpenSMTPD (currently in my overlay [1]).
What do we call it, and should it be included, or is it already
covered by another license we have?
* Portions Copyright (c) 1995 by International Business Machines, I
On 28/02/13 13:48, Eray Aslan (eras) wrote:
eras13/02/28 11:48:53
Modified: mailutils-2.99.97.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Fix building with ncurses[tinfo] - bug #459526
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha163/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit
with key 0x77F1F175586A3B
28.02.2013 01:30, Peter Stuge пишет:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> his sole two bugs
>
> Is there a rule in Gentoo that forbids a dev to fix a bug assigned to
> someone else? That would make absolutely no sense to me.
Without primary contact to bug's assignee(personally, of, if bug is
assigned to proje
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:06:25 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> On 02/24/2013 11:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > On 24/02/13 02:34, hasufell wrote:
> >> Some people seem to feel uncomfortable with autotools-multilib, because
> >> it depends on autotools-utils.
> >>
> >> Instead of arguing whether it makes
12 matches
Mail list logo
