Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal

2013-02-23 Thread hasufell
Before people start asking I should explain why I started this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458638 I think having such an eclass has several advantages over autootools-multilib.eclass (which depends on autotools-utils.eclass) as it is now: a) Less eclass dependencies. One could argue:

[gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal

2013-02-23 Thread hasufell
Some people seem to feel uncomfortable with autotools-multilib, because it depends on autotools-utils. Instead of arguing whether it makes sense or not I'd propose a similar autotools related eclass. I also attach an example conversion of media-libs/libexif (the maintainer wants to keep the chang