On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Martin Pluskal wrote:
> I am thinking about creating ebuild for shim. I was wondering if there
> is any policy or suggestion where to place .efi binaries or how to
> handle them in gentoo - it seems that there is none so perhaps there
> should be agreed on what best
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Stefan Ehret wrote:
>
> * *
> * PLEACE SAFE THE SOURCE *
> * *
>
>
>
Annnd
* *
* PLEACE SAFE THE SOURCE *
* *
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:41:04 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Thursday 07 of February 2013 06:52:44 Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> > Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > > we as gentoo will provide both while preffered default will be
> > > what major distros use.
> >
> > What kind of careless mainstream attitud
On Thursday 07 of February 2013 06:52:44 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > we as gentoo will provide both while preffered default will be what
> > major distros use.
>
> What kind of careless mainstream attitude is that? Really?
Quite the opposite, decision to use implementation A ove
Rich Freeman wrote:
> any tag in Github can be downloaded as a tarball with a constant md5
Note that gitweb also offers snapshot links. Many upstream gitwebs
have that feature enabled, saving even the work of mirroring to github.
//Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/02/13 01:14 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> 2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò :
>> On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>>
>>> Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
>>
>> I would say that we might want to review linux-firm
El vie, 08-02-2013 a las 19:01 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >
> > Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
>
> I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the
> newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid
2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò :
> On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>
>> Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
>
> I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the
> newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one.
>
That should be probab
On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the
newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu —
Any objections if I slap a generic package.mask on every firmware
package installing to wrong directory?
Half of them install to /$(get_libdir)/firmware as opposed to correct
/lib/firmware.
Most of them are maintainer-needed@ and very old.
Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and un
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 8 February 2013 09:38, Peter Stuge wrote:
>>> !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
>>> >>
>>> >> lets hope infra will ban him from the list
>>> >
>>> > What's with al
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> How people serve binaries (tar.gz source files) to complement the
> repository?
> Github doesn't seem to have a way to have a binary repository and serve
> single files.
> Heroku maybe?
Single files - not sure (maybe a raw URL?).
However, any ta
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g.,
>>> it would be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order
>>> to conform
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:03 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm the author of bashlibs - general library framework and libraries
> > for bash programing.
> > I have created new overlay for bash libraries.
> > https://github.com/kfirlavi/ba
On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
>> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
>> instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also use
On 8 February 2013 09:38, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
>> >>>
>> >>> Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
>> >>
>> >> lets hope infra will ban him from the list
>> >
>> > What's with all the leniency? I thought we used the death penalty on
>> > the
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Live a little. Send a funny email to a list once.
aight boss
> !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
> >>>
> >>> Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
> >>
> >> lets hope infra will ban him from the list
> >
> > What's with all the leniency? I thought we used the death penalty on
> > the first offense?
>
> Oh I am sorry. I didn't realize yo
On 8 February 2013 02:27, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 02/07/2013 05:00 PM, Ian Whyman wrote:
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
>>>
>>> Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
>>>
>>
>> lets hope infra will ban him from the
20 matches
Mail list logo
