On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:03 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm the author of bashlibs - general library framework and libraries
> for bash programing.
> I have created new overlay for bash libraries.
> https://github.com/kfirlavi/bashlibs/tree/master/gentoo/portage
>
> How do I publish it via l
Hi,
I'm the author of bashlibs - general library framework and libraries for
bash programing.
I have created new overlay for bash libraries.
https://github.com/kfirlavi/bashlibs/tree/master/gentoo/portage
How do I publish it via layman or eix-remote?
Regards,
Kfir
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 05:00 PM, Ian Whyman wrote:
>>> !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
>>
>> Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
>>
>
> lets hope infra will ban him from the list
What's with all the leniency? I thought we used t
On Tuesday 05 of February 2013 21:19:24 you wrote:
> +CMAKE_VERBOSE=1
This is already eclass default.
> + abi_configure() {
> + local mycmakeargs=(
> + "${mycmakeargs[@]}"
> + -DVGL_LIBDIR=/usr/$(get_libdir)
> + -DTJPEG_
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013, 18:00:40 schrieb Ian Whyman:
> > !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
>
> Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
Must be this cosmic radiation then... :D
huettel@pinacolada ~ $ eix net-mail/devcron
* net-mail/devcron
Available versions: 1.00 {{+
On 02/07/2013 11:07 AM, Stefan Ehret wrote:
>
> ==
>
>
> !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
>
>
> ==
>
>
>
>
>
NOT IT!!!
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Descri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/07/2013 05:00 PM, Ian Whyman wrote:
>> !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
>
> Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
>
lets hope infra will ban him from the list
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://de
> !!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
==
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
==
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
> instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
> our documentation pages and is the name in t
On 7 February 2013 16:07, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
> instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
> our documentation pages and is the name in the SPD
I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1],
So, while in general I'm against ren
On 6 February 2013 15:30, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA256
>> >
>> > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >> On 6 Fe
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 10:23 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So, *my
On 7 February 2013 16:36, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 6 February 2013 04:19, Michał Górny wrote:
>> The idea is the same as in autotools-multilib. The eclass
>> is a straightfoward wrapper for cmake-utils which inherits
>> multilib-build and runs cmake phase functions for all ABIs (using
>> out-of-s
On 6 February 2013 04:19, Michał Górny wrote:
> The idea is the same as in autotools-multilib. The eclass
> is a straightfoward wrapper for cmake-utils which inherits
> multilib-build and runs cmake phase functions for all ABIs (using
> out-of-source build).
>
> The eclass uses the same header con
16 matches
Mail list logo
