Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-02-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > we as gentoo will provide both while preffered default will be what > major distros use. What kind of careless mainstream attitude is that? Really? I mean: You are saying that given two options, Gentoo will do whatever "major distros" are doing. (Never mind that Gentoo *is

Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?

2013-02-06 Thread Philip Webb
130206 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 06/02/2013 14:58, Markos Chandras wrote: >> Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run >> so we don't end up with stable entries in /var/run directory? > I would say that we should have that symlink > and I told WilliamH so before. FWIW I have : root:5

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-util/dwdiff

2013-02-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
Feel free to grab dev-util/dwdiff if you want. Thanks! Perhaps shell-tools@ herd?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Porting ZFS to additional architectures

2013-02-06 Thread Richard Yao
On 02/06/2013 11:26 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Richard Yao wrote: >> Dear Everyone, >> >> Does anyone have root access to Linux systems on any of the following >> architectures that is willing to help ZFS development? >> >> Alpha >> HPPA >> IA-64 >> MIPS/MIPS64 >> PP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Porting ZFS to additional architectures

2013-02-06 Thread Richard Yao
On 02/06/2013 02:12 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:25:56 -0500 > Richard Yao wrote: > >> I want to port ZFSOnLinux to all Gentoo Linux architectures this year. >> The above architectures either are not currently supported or have not >> been tested in a while. Most of them

Re: [gentoo-dev] Porting ZFS to additional architectures

2013-02-06 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > Dear Everyone, > > Does anyone have root access to Linux systems on any of the following > architectures that is willing to help ZFS development? > > Alpha > HPPA > IA-64 > MIPS/MIPS64 > PPC/PPC64 > SH > SPARC/SPARC64 http://www.gentoo.org/pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread Cyprien Nicolas
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Portage will "cleanup" the /var/run symlink after unmerging the last > package that installed files under /var/run. And if you install back that package, portage will create the /var/run directory, and not the symlink. openssh-6.1_p1

Re: [gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > >> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >>> > >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >>> >>> So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some >>> point the

Re: [gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> >> So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some >> point the /run migration did happen and compatibility symlinks >> were created

Re: [gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread Markos Chandras
On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some point > the /run migration did happen and compatibility symlinks were created. > If hwoarang's systems don't have this, there must be an issue somewhere. > My system is a brand n

Re: [gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/13 09:18 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 06/02/13 09:02 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> On 06/02/2013 14:58, Markos Chandras wrote: >>> Thanks. Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run so we >>> don't end up with stable entries in

[gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/13 09:02 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 06/02/2013 14:58, Markos Chandras wrote: >> Thanks. Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run so we >> don't end up with stable entries in /var/run directory? Some of >> my init scripts appea

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Convert virtualgl to cmake-multilib.

2013-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:02:35 -0300 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:07:21 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > RDEPEND="ssl? ( dev-libs/openssl ) > > media-libs/libjpeg-turbo > > x11-libs/libX11 > > x11-libs/libXext > > x11-libs/libXv > > - multilib? ( app-emulation

Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?

2013-02-06 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 06/02/2013 14:58, Markos Chandras wrote: > Thanks. Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run so we don't > end up with stable entries in /var/run directory? Some of my init > scripts appear to reported as "crashed" whereas the process is running > just fine. I suspect this is because a sta

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Convert virtualgl to cmake-multilib.

2013-02-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:07:21 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > RDEPEND="ssl? ( dev-libs/openssl ) > media-libs/libjpeg-turbo > x11-libs/libX11 > x11-libs/libXext > x11-libs/libXv > - multilib? ( app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs > + abi_x86_32? ( app-emulation/emul-lin

Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?

2013-02-06 Thread Markos Chandras
On 6 February 2013 13:55, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote: >> I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them are >> using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and there is >> no /var/run although some init scripts are trying to

Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?

2013-02-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/13 08:55 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote: >> I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them >> are using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and >> there is no /var/r

Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?

2013-02-06 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote: > I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them are > using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and there is > no /var/run although some init scripts are trying to use it. Which one > is the correct one and why do we have

[gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?

2013-02-06 Thread Markos Chandras
Hi all, I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them are using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and there is no /var/run although some init scripts are trying to use it. Which one is the correct one and why do we have both? The following guide only mentions /va

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-06 Thread Dennis Lan (dlan)
Hi ALL: I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka) dev-libs/libev which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526 net-misc/ofono need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.12) If any developer willing to hel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-06 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:16:32 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 02/03/2013 09:45 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > >> dev-libs/boehm-gc > > > > Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. > > > Since it's a depende

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Convert virtualgl to cmake-multilib.

2013-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
--- ...algl-2.3.2.ebuild => virtualgl-2.3.2-r1.ebuild} | 77 +- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) copy gx86/x11-misc/virtualgl/{virtualgl-2.3.2.ebuild => virtualgl-2.3.2-r1.ebuild} (52%) diff --git a/gx86/x11-misc/virtualgl/virtualgl-2.3.2.ebuild b/gx86/x11-

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Introduce cmake-multilib wrapper for cmake-utils.

2013-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
--- gx86/eclass/cmake-multilib.eclass | 56 +++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gx86/eclass/cmake-multilib.eclass diff --git a/gx86/eclass/cmake-multilib.eclass b/gx86/eclass/cmake-multilib.eclass new file mode 100644 index 000..7e929b

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Introduce cmake-multilib wrapper for cmake-utils.

2013-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:32:59 -0300 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 21:19:23 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > +cmake-multilib_src_install() { > > + cmake-multilib_secure_install() { > > + cmake-utils_src_install > > + > > + # Make sure all headers are the same f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-06 Thread Thomas Kahle
On 13:46 Sun 03 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > dev-cpp/gtest I'll take this one. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature