On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 00:38 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > For cross-chroots its needed to have static qemu-$arch user translators. May
> > be you can introduce user-static use flag for them? Also it will be cool to
> > have i
В письме от 14 января 2013 00:38:06 пользователь Doug Goldstein написал:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > For cross-chroots its needed to have static qemu-$arch user translators.
> > May be you can introduce user-static use flag for them? Also it will be
>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For cross-chroots its needed to have static qemu-$arch user translators. May
> be you can introduce user-static use flag for them? Also it will be cool to
> have init script for kvm
>
USE=static is available for app-emulation/qemu.
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > but
> > again it appears that simple cases are being made complex, just to allow
> > for someone else's complex cases. Which is faulty logic.
>
> It's a welcome option but an important question seems to be; Why wasn't
> this picked up in the dev cycle?.
>
That would req
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 William Hubbs wrote:
> Steven J. Long wrote:
> > Obviously it's good to have the functionality should you need it, but
> > again it appears that simple cases are being made complex, just to allow
> > for someone else's complex cases. Which is faulty logic.
> >
> > While many p
Hi!
For cross-chroots its needed to have static qemu-$arch user translators. May
be you can introduce user-static use flag for them? Also it will be cool to
have init script for kvm
В письме от 11 января 2013 22:45:30 пользователь Doug Goldstein написал:
> Just wanted to give everyone a heads u
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-01-13 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-haskell/time2013-01-11 22:11:52 slyfox
app-emulation/qemulator 2013-01-12 07:49:01 cardoe
app-admin/webalize
> but
> again it appears that simple cases are being made complex, just to allow
> for someone else's complex cases. Which is faulty logic.
It's a welcome option but an important question seems to be; Why wasn't
this picked up in the dev cycle?.
This reminds me of udisks 8 months ago losing feat
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
>> How does something not have a homepage? If upstream is gone, then by
>> definition, gentoo's the "upstream" as we're distributing it, so
>> gentoo.org becomes the homepage.
> If something is a six-liner made by Gentoo and for Gentoo, noone care
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:35:59 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le dimanche 13 janvier 2013 à 19:09 +, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
> > On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:03:20 +0100
> > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > > - if has ${EAPI-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && has doc ${IUSE} ;
> > > then
> > > +
Le dimanche 13 janvier 2013 à 19:09 +, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:03:20 +0100
> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > - if has ${EAPI-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && has doc ${IUSE} ; then
> > + if has ${EAPI:-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && in_iuse doc ; then
>
> This is still wrong..
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:09:05 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:03:20 +0100
> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > - if has ${EAPI-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && has doc ${IUSE} ; then
> > + if has ${EAPI:-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && in_iuse doc ; then
>
> This is still wrong... You can
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:03:20 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> - if has ${EAPI-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && has doc ${IUSE} ; then
> + if has ${EAPI:-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && in_iuse doc ; then
This is still wrong... You can't use IUSE like that.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Descript
Update previous patch fixing bug #383901 with comments on this bug.
---
eclass/gnome2.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/gnome2.eclass b/eclass/gnome2.eclass
index 750f20b..592585c 100644
--- a/eclass/gnome2.eclass
+++ b/eclass/gnome2.eclass
@@ -260
gnome2.eclass appends configure switches to user arguments.
Change logic so that it prepends values to G2CONF and pass extra args
of
gnome2_src_configure after G2CONF so that ebuilds can indeed override
eclass
settings.
---
eclass/gnome2.eclass | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 inserti
SCROLLKEEPER_UPDATE variable was deprecated long ago. It is no longer needed
and no longer in use in tree.
---
eclass/gnome2.eclass | 6 --
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/gnome2.eclass b/eclass/gnome2.eclass
index e263232..e2540d1 100644
--- a/eclass/gnome2.eclass
+++ b/
has bla ${IUSE} is "standardized" through in_iuse. Make use of this function.
---
eclass/gnome2.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/gnome2.eclass b/eclass/gnome2.eclass
index 70eb491..e263232 100644
--- a/eclass/gnome2.eclass
+++ b/eclass/gnome2.
Hi list,
here are a couple of patches to fix some bad behavior of the gnome2.eclass.
They have been sitting in the overlay for a while and I don't expect them to
cause any problem so I will commit then later today if nobody objects.
Gilles Dartiguelongue (4):
eclass/gnome2.eclass: switch IUSE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2013 12:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> If something is a six-liner made by Gentoo and for Gentoo, noone
> cares enough to create a homepage for it.
>
> http://gentoo.org is the most useless 'homepage' value you can use.
> It doesn't mean any
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:33:49 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 13 January 2013 13:27:44 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:27:02 -0500
> >
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday 13 January 2013 09:24:02 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild wi
On Sunday 13 January 2013 13:27:44 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:27:02 -0500
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 January 2013 09:24:02 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in:
> > > HOMEPAGE.missing 1
> >
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:27:02 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 13 January 2013 09:24:02 Michał Górny wrote:
> > Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in:
> >
> > HOMEPAGE.missing 1
> >app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild
>
> use the com
On Sunday 13 January 2013 08:29:43 Michał Górny wrote:
> + [[ ${BUILD_DIR} ]] || die "${FUNCNAME}: BUILD_DIR not set."
really should use -n there
> + pushd "${BUILD_DIR}" &>/dev/null || die
> + popd &>/dev/null || die
sending errors to /dev/null is wrong
-mike
signature.asc
Descrip
On Sunday 13 January 2013 09:24:02 Michał Górny wrote:
> Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in:
>
> HOMEPAGE.missing 1
>app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild
use the common eselect homepage ? http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/eselect/
-mike
sig
On 01/13/2013 07:03 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 09:43 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 01/13/2013 03:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>
>>> Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results
>>> in:
>>
>>> HOMEPAGE.missing 1
>>> app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-
On 01/13/2013 09:43 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 03:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hello,
>
>> Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results
>> in:
>
>> HOMEPAGE.missing 1
>> app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild
>
>> Note: use --include-dev (-d) to c
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:33:27 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Michał Górny posted on Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:24:02 +0100 as excerpted:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in:
> >
> > HOMEPAGE.missing 1
> >app-ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2013 03:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results
> in:
>
> HOMEPAGE.missing 1
> app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild
>
> Note: use --include-dev (-d) to ch
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:24:02 +0100 as excerpted:
> Hello,
>
> Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in:
>
> HOMEPAGE.missing 1
>app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild
>
> Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies fo
Le dimanche 13 janvier 2013 à 09:52 -0600, William Hubbs a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 04:08:18PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:05:31 -0600
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > The run_in_build_dir()
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 07:36:59 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > The run_in_build_dir() command simply runs given command
> > in the directory stated as BUILD_DIR. This variable is used commonly
> > by autotools-utils, cmake-utils and python-r1 ecl
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:52:09 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 04:08:18PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:05:31 -0600
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > The run_in_build_dir() command
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 04:08:18PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:05:31 -0600
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > The run_in_build_dir() command simply runs given command
> > > in the directory stated as BUILD_DIR.
Le dimanche 13 janvier 2013 à 16:08 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit :
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:05:31 -0600
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > The run_in_build_dir() command simply runs given command
> > > in the directory stated as BUILD_D
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> The run_in_build_dir() command simply runs given command
> in the directory stated as BUILD_DIR. This variable is used commonly
> by autotools-utils, cmake-utils and python-r1 eclasses, therefore I'm
> proposing adding the relevant function to
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:05:31 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > The run_in_build_dir() command simply runs given command
> > in the directory stated as BUILD_DIR. This variable is used commonly
> > by autotools-utils, cmake-utils and pyt
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> The run_in_build_dir() command simply runs given command
> in the directory stated as BUILD_DIR. This variable is used commonly
> by autotools-utils, cmake-utils and python-r1 eclasses, therefore I'm
> proposing adding the relevant fun
Hello,
Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in:
HOMEPAGE.missing 1
app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild
Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies for 'dev' profiles
Please fix these important QA issues first.
Why is this considered
The run_in_build_dir() command simply runs given command
in the directory stated as BUILD_DIR. This variable is used commonly
by autotools-utils, cmake-utils and python-r1 eclasses, therefore I'm
proposing adding the relevant function to eutils.
---
gx86/eclass/eutils.eclass | 19 +
El dom, 13-01-2013 a las 04:54 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 01/13/2013 04:18 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > What about this approach?
>
> You should use ${SLOT%/*}, in order to exclude the sub-slot, because you
> don't care about the sub-slot and the slash would cause problems.
Thanks, updated ec
On 01/13/2013 04:18 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> What about this approach?
You should use ${SLOT%/*}, in order to exclude the sub-slot, because you
don't care about the sub-slot and the slash would cause problems.
--
Thanks,
Zac
El sáb, 12-01-2013 a las 04:49 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/12/2013 02:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 12-01-2013 a las 02:01 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
> >> On 01/12/2013 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> El mié, 09-01-2013 a las
42 matches
Mail list logo
