[gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:36:59 -0800 as excerpted: >> Thought: Do the CVS keyword expansion in repoman, and then feed the >> expanded file to CVS for commit. This gives you a fixed file, which >> you can then generate your manifest against. > > Yeah, I guess that will work, if we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/08/2013 11:36 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 01/08/2013 11:24 PM, Douglas Freed wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> The CVS keyword expansion causes the ebuild digest to mutate during the >>> commit. If we repoman could predict correctly emulate the CVS keywords >>> e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/08/2013 11:24 PM, Douglas Freed wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >> The CVS keyword expansion causes the ebuild digest to mutate during the >> commit. If we repoman could predict correctly emulate the CVS keywords >> expansion on the client side, then it could gener

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Douglas Freed
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > The CVS keyword expansion causes the ebuild digest to mutate during the > commit. If we repoman could predict correctly emulate the CVS keywords > expansion on the client side, then it could generate a correct Manifest > in advance. However, that

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:50:32 +0100 "viv...@gmail.com" wrote: > > We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is fixed: > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561 > > > > Other architectures are probably okay. > > > What about jumping straight to 4.7.2 do you (arm-team)

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-08 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:01:00PM -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Just a heads up, > > > > DNSSEC is now live on *.dev.gentoo.org hosts. > > So for those that had to look up some or all of what Robin mentioned, > I'll summarize below. F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please guys use checkpath in init scripts

2013-01-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 07 January 2013 15:52:40 Alec Warner wrote: > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > I just gave a quick look at the init scripts installed on the tinderbox, > > and the amount of them that use mkdir to create the directories in /run > > and similar is astounding. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 07/01/2013 17:13, Richard Yao ha scritto: On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any issues please let us know. We probably should not sta