Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

2013-01-07 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/07/2013 05:35 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 01/06/2013 05:36 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 6, 2013 8:32 PM, "Zac Medico" >> > wrote: On 01/06/2013 01:04 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > On Fri, 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

2013-01-07 Thread Michael Mol
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 01/06/2013 05:36 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> On Jan 6, 2013 8:32 PM, "Zac Medico" > > wrote: >>> >>> On 01/06/2013 01:04 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: >>> > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:34:59 -0600 >>> > Donnie Berkholz mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

2013-01-07 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/07/2013 11:46 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Pacho Ramos (2013-01-07 10:34:52) >> - Eclass was originally oriented to cover those kind of messages >> that could be shown by elog first time the package is merged and, >> later, re

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-07 Thread Benjamin Lee
On 01/07/2013 06:34 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > browser plugins? Also, how widespread is client DNSSEC support? E.g., > I enabled DNSSEC for my domain, but not sure yet whether DNS > resolution anywhere will fail in case DNS responses are spoofed. Comcast runs dnssec-failed.org, which is convenien

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-07 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Firefox: > Plugin needed: > https://os3sec.org/ Doesn't work for me (no effect), stalls browser for long periods of time. > Chrome: > Already included in stock, see > http://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/06/16/dnssecchrome.html What seems

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-07 Thread Richard Yao
On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any > blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any > issues please let us know. > > > We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-07 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:34:09PM +0200, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Thereafter, I'd also like to deploy DANE and SSH > > fingerprints in DNS, and remove our reliance any elements of the CA > > chain. > Isn't DANE highly experimental and onl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please guys use checkpath in init scripts

2013-01-07 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > I just gave a quick look at the init scripts installed on the tinderbox, > and the amount of them that use mkdir to create the directories in /run > and similar is astounding. > > Please check `man runscript` and use the checkpath helper

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please guys use checkpath in init scripts

2013-01-07 Thread Sergey Popov
06.01.2013 23:30, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." пишет: > On 1/6/13 8:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> I just gave a quick look at the init scripts installed on the tinderbox, >> and the amount of them that use mkdir to create the directories in /run >> and similar is astounding. >> >> Please check `man ru

Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

2013-01-07 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Hi, Quoting Pacho Ramos (2013-01-07 10:34:52) > - Eclass was originally oriented to cover those kind of messages that > could be shown by elog first time the package is merged and, later, > rely on people reading that README.gentoo This would be good - show README.gentoo for first time, and treat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Time based retirements

2013-01-07 Thread Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-12-12 13:32, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On 21 December 2012 17:36, Ciaran McCreesh > wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 + Markos Chandras >> wrote: >>> Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like >>> the existing policy,

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-07 Thread Peter Stuge
Maxim Kammerer wrote: > Also, how widespread is client DNSSEC support? E.g., I enabled > DNSSEC for my domain, but not sure yet whether DNS resolution > anywhere will fail in case DNS responses are spoofed. There is a gap between applications asking resolvers to do lookups and resolvers which can

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-07 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Thereafter, I'd also like to deploy DANE and SSH > fingerprints in DNS, and remove our reliance any elements of the CA > chain. Isn't DANE highly experimental and only supported by a couple of browser plugins? Also, how widespread is clien

Re: [gentoo-dev] What did we achieve in 2012? What are our resolutions for 2013?

2013-01-07 Thread Peter Stuge
Ben de Groot wrote: > Is it really newsworthy to say that the Gentoo developer community > thinks we haven't accomplished much? Spin it: Write that you asked developers but only got very little feedback (literally only a handful of people replied), summarize the replies, and then ask for a dialogu

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-07 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Ryan Hill schrieb: > This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are > hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if > anyone knows of any issues please let us know. There is still one blocker to bug 346809 which may cause headaches for arm users. [4.6/ICE] i

Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

2013-01-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 04-01-2013 a las 23:34 -0600, Donnie Berkholz escribió: > On 10:26 Sat 22 Dec , Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Hello > > > > After seeing: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440214 > > > > Looking to a lot of its blockers shows that we are using "elog" messages > > for informing peop

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-07 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any > blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any > issues please let us know. +1. I know I've been clicking around those bug trees a few tim