Re: [gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

2012-12-07 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Sounds good to me. Tinderbox was fine with the latest changes to icu. Just for reference, next time it would be nice to unmask this when chromium and libreoffice are both bumped (i.e., two days ago), so that people don't have to rebuild them twice... luckily for me I kept it unmasked when testing

[gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

2012-12-07 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
# Tomáš Chvátal (04 Nov 2012) # Masked for testing with gcc-4.7 and to verify reverse deps >dev-libs/icu-49.9.1 I think with icu-50.1-r2 the problems are solved. It should get more testing in ~arch. I'd like to unmask it. WDYT? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] borked release media

2012-12-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:55 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Hey people, what are we going to do with bugs like: > > > > > I'd like to help with things. Is the process of building livecd .isos > and s

[gentoo-dev] borked release media

2012-12-07 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Hey people, what are we going to do with bugs like: I'd like to help with things. Is the process of building livecd .isos and stages documented somewhere? I'd like to reproduce problems locally, work

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes

2012-12-07 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:58:00PM +, Mick wrote: > On Friday 07 Dec 2012 16:41:27 William Hubbs wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > > I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable. > > > > > > The team had been testing from the

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: app-emulation/qemulator

2012-12-07 Thread Doug Goldstein
# Doug Goldstein (07 Dec 2012) # Masked for removal in 30 days. (07 Jan 2012) # Upstream says the project is dead and is being replaced app-emulation/qemulator -- Doug Goldstein

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes

2012-12-07 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable. > > The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the > way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new > openrc stable

[gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes

2012-12-07 Thread William Hubbs
I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable. The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken. There hadn't been bugs reported,