On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:52:46AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> > Debian / Ubuntu have a tool that basically does this. Its
> > update-initramfs. I believe it is called from..the postinst of
> > packages that are supposed to be in the init
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Yeah, that was my thought as well. The text was lifted from our
> charter, which was apparently written from a problem/solution
> standpoint rather than something that would be less time-bound. It
> doesn't really make sense having the orga
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:30 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:58:32PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
>
> I'm not a dev, and I haven't really been following this thread, but
> all the other organization summaries start out with something lik
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:58:32PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
I'm not a dev, and I haven't really been following this thread, but
all the other organization summaries start out with something like
Organization X is …
not
In order to sustain the current
On 26.11.2012 21:58, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up.
>
> This has been setup (with Donnie's help):
>
> https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
>
> I've claimed 15 of the projects on
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
>
> So, users will just move config in an elog? Oh, and they don't even use.
see what happens when you delete context ?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:17:13 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Maybe. On the other hand, the udev->systemd switch was performed
> upstream which makes it a valid candidate for package move.
No, it's not a valid candidate for a package move if the destination
package already exists. A "move" is specific
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up.
This has been setup (with Donnie's help):
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
I've claimed 15 of the projects on there that I could easily find,
analysis on those should co
On 11/26/2012 01:52 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 26-11-2012 a las 18:58 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Swegener recently moved away from the following packages:
app-admin/eselect-pinentry
app-crypt/pinentry
Thanks for taking care of them if you want
And:
net-dns/avahi
This one is interesting
El lun, 26-11-2012 a las 18:58 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Swegener recently moved away from the following packages:
> app-admin/eselect-pinentry
> app-crypt/pinentry
>
> Thanks for taking care of them if you want
And:
net-dns/avahi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
On 26/11/2012 10:17, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Howsabout following the same procedure as when xpdf was dropped? I
> vaguely remember "emerge --update --deep world" stopping with a message
> that xpdf was being dropped, and also a few alternatives were suggested
> in the message.
That's the p.maks me
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:33:15AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote
>
> the inability to "make" users read the package.mask message explaining
> the situation is the only valid point in your e-mail.
>
> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
Howsabout following the same pro
Swegener recently moved away from the following packages:
app-admin/eselect-pinentry
app-crypt/pinentry
Thanks for taking care of them if you want
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> I'd like to retire from these sometime soon:
>
> dev-lua/lua-zlib: no other maintainers/herd
> dev-lua/luadbi: no other maintainers/herd
> dev-lua/luaevent: blueness, rafaelmartins
> dev-lua/luaexpat: rafaelmartins
> dev-lua/luasec: rafae
On 04:22 Fri 23 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:22:10PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 11:11 Sun 18 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > Here's a list of every package where I'm a maintainer and there is no
> > > herd listed (but their might be other maintain
On 26/11/2012 00:20, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The request is for Gentoo administration. So, talking about developers
> of a language is not the question.
"Gentoo administration"? What on earth would that be?
> I am a ruby developer and having ruby18 or ruby_1_8 is not much a
> problem. There ar
On 11/26/2012 01:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
>
> So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
> need to manually move config files and update logrota
I'd like to retire from these sometime soon:
dev-lua/lua-zlib: no other maintainers/herd
dev-lua/luadbi: no other maintainers/herd
dev-lua/luaevent: blueness, rafaelmartins
dev-lua/luaexpat: rafaelmartins
dev-lua/luasec: rafaelmartins
net-im/prosody: klausman, rafaelmartins
AFAICT Rafael isn't ve
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
need to manually move config files and update logrotate.d files (if in
use), and the only notice will be i
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> xchat & hexchat are different packages. It's a bit like pretending that
> the discontinuation and fork didn't ever happen, and the packages are
> equivalent (which they are not, as have been already pointed out).
they're about as equivalent as
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 05:07:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> >>> I als
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> >>> I also planned to release a news through the portage news syst
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>>> I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as
>>> I
>>> lastrite xchat so people know how to move
On 11/26/2012 12:40 AM, Denis M. (Phr33d0m) wrote:
> Hello, I'd have to mention, as HexChat is a fork from XChat it strictly
> depends on gtk+-2 as well. So removing gtk+-2* will make HexChat
> unusuable (at least the GUI). Also there are no plans on porting it to
> anything like gtk+-3 (or Qt (I h
The 24/11/12, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> No. Being consistently stupid is not a good reason to be consistent.
Stop being fallacious, please.
> And since as I said the RUBY_TARGETS interface is designed to be _usable
> by Ruby developers_, being consistent and breaking that, is not
> something I
26 matches
Mail list logo
