[gentoo-dev] An apology for some of my earlier comments

2012-11-20 Thread Richard Yao
Dear Greg, The eudev project has suffered a fair number of psychological attacks against project members. I know that you are a strong supporter of systemd. When you emailed gentoo-dev@, I assumed that you were trying to harm the project and treated you as such. After seeing your responses to peop

[gentoo-dev] media-sound/ardour needs a maintainer

2012-11-20 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello After talking with Alexis about ardour maintenance, looks like nobody in proaudio herd has time to take care of it and, then, would be nice if it could get a maintainer. Thanks a lot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-20 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:08:38PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:08:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote >>> >>> > Again, any specific pointer to a commit in the tree that cau

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-20 Thread Walter Dnes
I jumped off udev before I was pushed off... https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev/Automount_USB While the Gentoo council meeting was looking at patches to udev on an ongoing basis, I was planning for a worst-case scenario where a separate /usr without initramfs i

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-20 Thread Michael Mol
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:08:38PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:08:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote >> >> > Again, any specific pointer to a commit in the tree that caused this? >> >> See http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?titl

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-20 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:08:38PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:08:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote > > > Again, any specific pointer to a commit in the tree that caused this? > > See http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Udev/upgrade&redirect=no > Comments? As I don't know

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/lyx: lyx-2.0.5.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-11-20 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:10:51 + (UTC) "Patrick Lauer (patrick)" wrote: > patrick 12/11/16 09:10:51 > > Modified: ChangeLog > Added:lyx-2.0.5.ebuild > Log: > Bump > While the bump was fine, please read the damn metadata.xml when you touch a package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright issues

2012-11-20 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/11/12 04:26 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anthony G Basile wrote: > >> The other levels are files and projects. So this leads to the >> other confusion, do you touch every file in the project when >> forking etc. > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright issues

2012-11-20 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 11/20/2012 04:26 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anthony G Basile wrote: The other levels are files and projects. So this leads to the other confusion, do you touch every file in the project when forking etc. The answer appears to be that a file is the unit, but from practice I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright issues

2012-11-20 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anthony G Basile wrote: > The other levels are files and projects. So this leads to the other > confusion, do you touch every file in the project when forking etc. > The answer appears to be that a file is the unit, but from practice > I've seen all three. What is corre

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due mobile herd removal

2012-11-20 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-11-2012 a las 19:13 -0500, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina escribió: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/18/2012 06:52 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Please be more careful declaring packages as "up for grabs". I am > personally maintainer of a number of these packages an