On 01/11/2012 19:23, Steven J. Long wrote:
> He's right tho: the topic was "Why doesn't your tinderbox work with
> overlays?" Your response was to insult Arfrever and not actually answer
> the point.
_Arfrever himself_ point to my reason in that blog post, FFS.
> Not that I agree with the argumen
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Steven J. Long
wrote:
> He's right tho: the topic was "Why doesn't your tinderbox work with
> overlays?" Your response was to insult Arfrever and not actually answer
> the point.
Well, nobody is paying Diego to make a tinderbox that works with
overlays. He actual
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 01:00:14 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> This has nothing to do with dependencies not getting rebuilt when the library
> does. It's about switching to an earlier compiler version and having
> every single package depending on that library fail to build due to something
> that is non-
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:50:13PM -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Dirty experiments, no. Testing stuff that's almost ready, yes. If you
> run the tinderbox against dirty experiments, the time _I_ pour in to
> sort through the logs report bugs is wasted because they'll hit stupid
> hacks that fa
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:30:06 +0100
Peter Stuge wrote:
> I guess it will be difficult for representatives from a given distribution to
> "fix" very much upstream, if possible I think that the distribution should
> instead be fixed to deal with the limits imposed by upstream practises.
Also, the am
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:30:06 +0100
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > You can NOT
>
> I am not saying that it is a good idea, but of course you can. It has
> pretty sucky effects on how your library can be used, disabling
> various smart stuff that modern systems do, but I guess the upstre
On 10/31/12 11:13 PM, Graham Murray wrote:
> Ryan Hill writes:
>
>> Christ on a $#@%! crutch. You can NOT auto-enable C++11 in your library
>> based
>> on a configure test and then stuff flags that are not supported by previous
>> compiler versions into pkg-config for library consumers. Somebo
Hi all,
I know it's been much awaited, but I didn't have a lot of faith in it
previously, so I didn't want to destroy the systems of our ~arch users
by releasing MySQL/MariaDB 5.5.x on them.
However, as of today, I believe that it is sufficiently ready to be used
on ~arch systems, and I will be u
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:51:52PM -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 16:47, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > I'm going to put the following masks in for the above:
> If you're already doing the job would you mind just masking the use flag
> globally, and not just for mysql/mariadb?
I did
On 01/11/2012 16:47, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm going to put the following masks in for the above:
If you're already doing the job would you mind just masking the use flag
globally, and not just for mysql/mariadb?
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeye
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:47:34AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With regards to bug #304435[1], we would like to formalise the policy
> for touching arch profiles' files.
>
> The key suggested points:
Ok, this then clears the way for MySQL 5.5 to enter the tree.
bug #351931: dev
Hello,
Recently I have committed a new dev-python/argparse revision. I have
migrated it to distutils-r1 and enabled building only for those Python
versions which don't have argparse built-in. Sadly, I had to
package.mask it since it suffers a REQUIRED_USE issue on modern systems.
For those who ar
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:42:52 -0400
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Shortly saying, devmanual in wiki would mostly consist of HTML tagsoup
> > intermixed with wiki text. For the very simple reason that MediaWiki
> > lags markup for as basic things as in
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:38 +0100
> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Michael Palimaka
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2] into
>> > the devmanua
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:38 +0100
Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Michael Palimaka
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2] into
> > the devmanual[3].
> >
> > As the project has grown, so has the amount - and
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:59:09 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > What if you don't have the privilege to assign bugs, but are
> > willing to do the work of filing the bugs?
>
> Yeah, that kind of sucks. Perhaps we should extend the privilege a
> little more often?
In this case no prior history help
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 31.10.2012 14.39, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2]
>> into the devmanual[3].
>>
>> As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of
>> development
On 31.10.2012 14.39, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2]
> into the devmanual[3].
>
> As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of
> development information. I believe consolidation of this information
> i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/11/12 10:10 AM, Georg Rudoy wrote:
> 2012/11/1 Jamie Learmonth :
>> Firstly, why are you guys always so mad, and secondly why don't
>> we just start packaging more of these packages as binaries then
>> or bundling the needed version like the re
On 11/01/2012 02:50 PM, Jamie Learmonth wrote:
> Firstly, why are you guys always so mad, and secondly why don't we just
> start packaging more of these packages as binaries then or bundling the
> needed version like the rest of the world does anyways?
You lost faith in our ways, maybe dberkholz c
2012/11/1 Jamie Learmonth :
> Firstly, why are you guys always so mad, and secondly why don't we just
> start packaging more of these packages as binaries then or bundling the
> needed version like the rest of the world does anyways?
So are you suggesting to package all the binaries that depend up
On 01/11/2012 06:50, Jamie Learmonth wrote:
>
> Who's with me?
Not me.
If you're just looking for another binary distribution, CentOS is there.
Or Sabayon. Or Ubuntu. Pick your poison.
But I use and _develop_ Gentoo because I _want_, and sometimes just
_need_ source based! Sometiems it's becaus
Firstly, why are you guys always so mad, and secondly why don't we just
start packaging more of these packages as binaries then or bundling the
needed version like the rest of the world does anyways? For many packages
and systems (in this day and age of personal computing power) the advantage
of so
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>>> Though if you don't know these kinds of basics, I'm not sure you
>>> should be doing *any* (semi- or not) automated bug filing.
>>
>> What if you don't have the privilege to assign
Hi all,
With regards to bug #304435[1], we would like to formalise the policy
for touching arch profiles' files.
The key suggested points:
* Archs profiles should generally only be touched by members of that
arch team, unless prior permission is given
* Exception: anyone may add a mask to
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> And even if that, you have no right to remove maintainers
> from a package or unCC them from bugs just because you don't like them
> or disagree with their opinion. Especially that you are not
> a maintainer of this package.
>
To be honest,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/01/2012 03:59 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>>> Though if you don't know these kinds of basics, I'm not sure you
>>> should be doing *any* (semi- or not) automated bug filing.
>>
>> What if y
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I've created licenses/HPND [1] now, and added it to the @OSI-APPROVED
> group. So packages whose license matches this template can be changed
> from as-is to HPND. (And please, _only_ OSD-compliant packages.
> We don't want the same mess again, as
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:58:16 -0700
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 31/10/2012 11:49, Michał Górny wrote:
> > In other words, you have thrown a big, destructive change to live,
> > stable systems without prior testing (and don't say you were able to
> > test it thoroughly in one day's time) and you
On 30/10/12 19:02, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 09:50 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
team has important bugs assigned to them for a long time, som
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Though if you don't know these kinds of basics, I'm not sure you
>> should be doing *any* (semi- or not) automated bug filing.
>
> What if you don't have the privilege to assign bugs, but are willing to
> do the work of filing the bugs?
Ye
31 matches
Mail list logo
