El sáb, 20-10-2012 a las 08:14 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:07:39 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 17:43 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
> > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:53:18 +0200
> > > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > >
> > > > Seriously, what people is s
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:07:39 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 17:43 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:53:18 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > > Seriously, what people is still having problems with handling eapi4?
> > > If there are doubts about its
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 22:37 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:01:57 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
> > you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
> > warning?
>
> In my opi
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 17:43 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:53:18 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > Seriously, what people is still having problems with handling eapi4?
> > If there are doubts about its usage, they should be asked and resolved
> > instead of ignored kee
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 22:39 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
> Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> > El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 21:43 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
> >> Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> >>> I volunteer to do whatever conversions you want for every ebuild I find
> >>> if I have time... what prevents me fro
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Sentences in English not only need to end with a dot but also require a
> subject
> and a predicate.
Another repoman check? And don't forget the topic for Japanese.
Il 19/10/2012 21:36, Thomas Sachau ha scritto:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
I dont know any such requirement from engli
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> This is not about "having problems with handling eapi-X", this is just
> about limited time and the choice where to spend that time. If you do
> just a version bump, you often dont have to touch the ebuild at all,
> just copy, test, commit an
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:53:18 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Seriously, what people is still having problems with handling eapi4?
> If there are doubts about its usage, they should be asked and resolved
> instead of ignored keeping ebuilds with older eapis. The only eapi
> that probably adds no advant
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 21:43 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
>> Pacho Ramos schrieb:
>>> I volunteer to do whatever conversions you want for every ebuild I find
>>> if I have time... what prevents me from doing it is to commit that
>>> changes to ebuilds not maintained by me
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:01:57 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
> you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
> warning?
In my opinion, descriptions should not be sentences. Sentences
in English not only nee
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 21:01 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
> you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
> warning?
>
> Thanks for your opinions
In English, it is also mandatory to end sentenc
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 21:43 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
> Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> > I volunteer to do whatever conversions you want for every ebuild I find
> > if I have time... what prevents me from doing it is to commit that
> > changes to ebuilds not maintained by me and not knowing if deve
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> I volunteer to do whatever conversions you want for every ebuild I find
> if I have time... what prevents me from doing it is to commit that
> changes to ebuilds not maintained by me and not knowing if developers
> agree on using latest eapi if possible. A more general soluti
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> Hello
>
> At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
> you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
> warning?
>
> Thanks for your opinions
>
I dont know any such requirement from english nor german and neither do
i see
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 15:47 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
[...]
> > Because it will add even more work, I mean:
> > - I catch a package using and old eapi and, then, still not passing
> > --disable-silent-rules option. => First problem, I need to notice that
> > package, there are packages I s
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
> you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
> warning?
>
> Thanks for your opinions
>
I don't really see the advantage or upside. Engl
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:09:15 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 14:51 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:21:52 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > What I am trying to say is that, if we agree latest eapi is
> > > technically better, we
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 14:51 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:21:52 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > What I am trying to say is that, if we agree latest eapi is
> > technically better, we need to try to get it used when possible (I
> > mean, when, for example,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:21:52 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
[...]
> What I am trying to say is that, if we agree latest eapi is
> technically better, we need to try to get it used when possible (I
> mean, when, for example, eclasses are ported) for a "QA" reasoning.
i think we all agree that there ar
El jue, 18-10-2012 a las 15:35 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Personally I see no major difficult in moving to eapi4, what exact
> > difficult are you (I mean people still sticking with eapi0/1) seeing?
>
> It is harder than cp. :)
>
> If
On 10/19/2012 07:23 AM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> I'm cooking up some eclass functions and it occurred to me that perhaps
> I had some responsibility regarding EAPI4's new error handling
> semantics. After looking into it, it seems that, superficially, the
> answer to my question is "no, the EAPI
I'm cooking up some eclass functions and it occurred to me that perhaps
I had some responsibility regarding EAPI4's new error handling
semantics. After looking into it, it seems that, superficially, the
answer to my question is "no, the EAPI4 changes only apply to ebuild
helpers."
Even so, t
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:37:13 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> Offhand... and this makes it a bit more complex, but still tenuable
> imo, but we could get around this via shoving the symlink pathway into
> the shebang itself.
>
> scenario 1:
> Script gets installed for 2.7, 3.1, 3.2; ignoring the s
25 matches
Mail list logo
