Re: [gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

2012-10-05 Thread Ben de Groot
On 5 October 2012 22:28, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32 > (), and upstream said they *won't* > support x32 > (). > > Note that with v8 it's no

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH/RFC] eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass: prepend-ldpath

2012-10-05 Thread Gregory M. Turner
[ "eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass" ]->8-> --- PORTAGE/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass +++ OVERLAY/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass @@ -117,6 +117,42 @@ return 0 } +# @FUNCTION: prepend-ldpath +# @USAGE: +# @DESCRIPTION: +# Place the specified ldpath into LDFLAGS before any options which co

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

2012-10-05 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > Is it possible to disable the JIT engine? Well, if you're going to wholesale disable functionality, how about client-side rendering? It drives me nuts as it is REALLY SLOW!!! That is, unless the graphics hardware is local to the client

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

2012-10-05 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:28 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32 > (), and upstream said they *won't* > support x32 > (). > > Note that with v8

[gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

2012-10-05 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32 (), and upstream said they *won't* support x32 (). Note that with v8 it's not just about getting v8 itself to compile, but also making it ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Initial python-r1.eclass & distutils-r1.eclass

2012-10-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:53:29 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent > earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) eclasses > for review. > > They are designed as 'mostly' drop-in python-distutils-ng replacement. Conversion o