On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:46:15 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 04:51, Theo Chatzimichos
> wrote:
> > One of the things that would be nice to have before the Git
> > migration is Documentation. Feel free to submit docs in the wiki,
> > and I'll help a lot after the conference as well.
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:43:09 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> I don't think any of the replacement options I've seen have this
> feature. Does anyone know of something that might offer us this? Or
> should we develop something in-house?
AFAIK some devrel related group already has some tool running tha
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:00:58 -0700
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> (Among other things, because it feels like most of the complains about
> the way tinderbox's logs are handled, "it's easy!" but nobody but me is
> ever going to pick up the task, ...)
Well, duh. You designed, developed, and are the
> On 30/09/12 06:15 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> yngwin has a point that I've not seen addressed.
>
> What /is/ wrong with the whole CDEPEND intermediate var idea?
>
The problem appears as we introduce more DEPEND variables
(which is what prompted the proposal, IIRC).
On 3 October 2012 04:51, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> One of the things that would be nice to have before the Git migration is
> Documentation. Feel free to submit docs in the wiki, and I'll help a lot after
> the conference as well.
Can you be more specific as to what kind of docs are needed?
--
On 3 October 2012 08:21, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
> bots:
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I th
On 3 October 2012 00:51, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> > What is the source data,
>
> Still unanswered. I'll ask something which would be equally helpful:
>
> Where is the software that currently sends out emails to the -commits list?
I don't know, but I assume it's a commit hook in
On Sunday 30 September 2012 17:44:05 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> +# @USAGE: gnome2_disable_deprecation_warning
no need for this
> + for makefile in $(find "${S}" -name "Makefile.in" \
> + -o -name "Makefile.am" -o -name "Makefile.decl" | sort); do
`local makefile` missing. al
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
> bots:
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this threa
On 10/02/2012 08:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
bots:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should lo
Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
bots:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should look
> > into this. Unless someone has a bette
On Tuesday 02 of October 2012 12:58:04 Ben de Groot wrote:
> Thank you so much for taking the time to give us this clear list of
> things that need to be done to take this forward!
Disclaimer: I haven't read Brian's long mail (and most of the mails in this
mailing list for the past month)
One of
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:40:45 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> Same difference applies; he's making the claim that the resolver
> can't tell that the python atom should be the same between build/run:
>
> dep:build,run? ( dev-lang/python:2.7= )
> build: dev-python/snakeoil
>
> # vs labels
>
> build+ru
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:08:02PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 02/10/12 01:56 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:51:01 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> > wrote:
> >> On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >>> On Sun,
Brian Harring wrote:
1) We need a thin manifest -> thick manifest converter. Thin
manifests are used for git- they store just DIST entries. Thick (also
known as 'full'), are what cvs/rsync users are familiar with- it holds
checksums for all content.
carebear is the current person volunteering
On Friday 17 August 2012 23:31:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> with glibc-2.15 gone stable, it's time to get 2.16 in the pipe. the big
> issues have been sorted out already. there's a few packages still known to
> build fail, but they've had quite some time to sort their stuff out, so i
> don't see de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:08:02 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > A := only makes sense for a dependency that is present both at
> > build time and at runtime. Currently, the only place you should be
> > seeing a := is on a spec that is listed in both DE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/10/12 01:56 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:51:01 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> wrote:
>> On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
>>> wrote:
> The second is that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:51:01 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
> > wrote:
> >>> The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from "cat/pkg
> >>> is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
> wrote:
>>> The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from "cat/pkg
>>> is a build dep, and cat/pkg is a run dep" to "cat/pkg is a dep
>>> that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/12 06:15 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> Pardon the belated response; responding to emails that are quick
> where possible, but lagging on -dev. Missed this one however...
>
No worries, there's a lot going on.. :D
yngwin has a point
Ben de Groot wrote:
> > What is the source data,
Still unanswered. I'll ask something which would be equally helpful:
Where is the software that currently sends out emails to the -commits list?
> > and what does the desired output look like?
>
> tetromino * gentoo-x86/x11-themes/gnome-themes-
On 2 October 2012 23:56, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> The -commits ML is okay (tho I don't want to subscribe to such a
>> high-volume ML), but we miss an IRC interface. The website and
>> statistics of cia.vc were nice too.
>
> What is the source data, and what does the desired outp
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 03:48:20 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 September 2012 01:24:32 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:17:03 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > > # Samuli Suominen (25 Sep 2012)
> > > # Multiple build failures: #435394, #423991 and #425806
> > > # Other bugs:
Ben de Groot wrote:
> The -commits ML is okay (tho I don't want to subscribe to such a
> high-volume ML), but we miss an IRC interface. The website and
> statistics of cia.vc were nice too.
What is the source data, and what does the desired output look like?
(I mean what should the messages in ch
On Wednesday 26 September 2012 01:24:32 Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:17:03 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > # Samuli Suominen (25 Sep 2012)
> > # Multiple build failures: #435394, #423991 and #425806
> > # Other bugs: #270830, #368409
> > # Unmasking would require addressing the build
26 matches
Mail list logo
