On 09/27/2012 01:30 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 27/09/12 04:13 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>>> Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend
>>> 'optional'; if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to
>>> switch to writing unfina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 04:13 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>> Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend
>> 'optional'; if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to
>> switch to writing unfinalized
On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend 'optional';
> if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to switch to
> writing unfinalized deps to the VDB, and all have to switch to
> transfering that IUSE_RUNTIME crap to the VDB
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:25:11PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:02:57 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > IUSE_RUNTIME is optional for PMs, why does the UI matter at all ?
> > > Also, the proposal doesn't a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Patch committed ; timing worked out that vapier and I were on irc at
the same time, and toolchain approval was granted.
Vapier did mention (on the bug as well as in-channel) that perhaps
'tc-arch-kernel' should move to linux-info.eclass ... If anyo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 01:55 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Hey all -- it's been a month since 432390 was filed; and this bug
> is keeping lirc-0.9.0-r2 from going stable. If nobody objects
> within the next 24h or so, I'm going to apply the following patch
> t
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale wrote:
>> wbrana wrote:
>>> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
>>> "Donate to support our development efforts."
>>> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain
>>> advertisements.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> My questions are this:
On 09/27/2012 10:45 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 27/09/12 12:02 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 27/09/12 11:57 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico
>>> wrote:
Hi,
The council has approved [1] "Profile IUSE injection" [2] for
inclusion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey all -- it's been a month since 432390 was filed; and this bug is
keeping lirc-0.9.0-r2 from going stable. If nobody objects within the
next 24h or so, I'm going to apply the following patch to
toolchain-funcs.eclass to fix the bug.
The patch do
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30:21AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 10:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> >> On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>> As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
> >>> must be disabled. Pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 12:02 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 27/09/12 11:57 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The council has approved [1] "Profile IUSE injection" [2] for
>>> inclusion in EAPI
On 09/27/2012 10:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
>>> must be disabled. Please review the patch included below.
>>>
>>> Ulrich
>>>
>>> --- eutil
On 09/27/2012 10:07 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function must be
>> disabled. Please review the patch included below.
>>
>> Ulrich
>>
>> --- eutils.eclass15 Sep 2012 16:16:53 - 1.403
>> ++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
>> must be disabled. Please review the patch included below.
>>
>> Ulrich
>>
>> --- eutils.ecla
On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function must be
> disabled. Please review the patch included below.
>
> Ulrich
>
> --- eutils.eclass 15 Sep 2012 16:16:53 - 1.403
> +++ eutils.eclass 27 Sep 2012 16:45:14 -
>
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function must be
disabled. Please review the patch included below.
Ulrich
--- eutils.eclass 15 Sep 2012 16:16:53 - 1.403
+++ eutils.eclass 27 Sep 2012 16:45:14 -
@@ -1373,7 +1373,9 @@
# @DESCRIPTION:
# If USE flag is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 11:57 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The council has approved [1] "Profile IUSE injection" [2] for
>> inclusion in EAPI 5, and in latest Portage we have experimental
>> EAPI 5
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The council has approved [1] "Profile IUSE injection" [2] for inclusion
> in EAPI 5, and in latest Portage we have experimental EAPI 5_pre2 [3]
> which implements all of the approved features. So, now would be a good
> time to start popu
Am 27.09.2012 09:22, schrieb Florian Philipp:
> Am 26.09.2012 23:53, schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp
>> wrote:
>>> Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 42365
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale wrote:
wbrana wrote:
> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
> "Donate to su
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> wbrana wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
"Donate to support our development efforts."
Gentoo could get more mo
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale wrote:
>> wbrana wrote:
>>> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
>>> "Donate to support our development efforts."
>>> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain
>>> advertisements.
>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale wrote:
> wbrana wrote:
>> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
>> "Donate to support our development efforts."
>> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
>>
>>
>
>
> My questions are this: Does Gentoo need more money?
wbrana wrote:
> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
> "Donate to support our development efforts."
> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
>
>
My questions are this: Does Gentoo need more money? Is it in need of
more funds to support itself?
Dale
:-
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:23 PM, wbrana wrote:
> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
> "Donate to support our development efforts."
> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
>
You already filed a bug against infra / www asking for this, and we
told you tha
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:23 AM, wbrana wrote:
> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
> "Donate to support our development efforts."
> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
I run a technical website with around 6k visits per day, and my
experience is that
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Michael Mol wrote:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the
> install media be replaced with pbzip2. It was closed a short while
> later, telling me that it'd involve changing what's kept in @system,
> and that had to be discussed here, rather than
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:43:27PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> > A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
> > media be replaced with
> > pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
> > involve c
Hi!
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> A different question is whether in the cases where parallel bzip2 makes
> sense, is it really the best solution? xz is outperforming bzip2's
> compression ratio for large files (for an informal comparison, see bug
> 434350). And xz is
Am 26.09.2012 23:53, schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp
> wrote:
>> Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be repl
30 matches
Mail list logo
