On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
>> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
>> > Michał Górny wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
>
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
> > > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > >
> > > > you dont need this, the
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > > you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for you: call
> > > directly the relevant funct
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for you: call
> > directly the relevant function.
> >
> > src_multilib_compile() {
> > forall ABIS; do
> >
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for you: call
> directly the relevant function.
>
> src_multilib_compile() {
> forall ABIS; do
> prepare ABI variables
> src_compile
> done
> }
Instead of 'redoing' the installed script, just rename the ones
installed by distutils in each phase.
This also changes suffixes from -pythonX_Y to -pythonX.Y for no good
reason.
---
gx86/eclass/python-distutils-ng.eclass | 39 +++---
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+),
Move the logic out of doscript() to make it reusable. Also, use
_PYTHON_ALL_IMPLS[@] instead of hardcoding the preference list.
---
gx86/eclass/python-distutils-ng.eclass | 38 +-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gx86/eclass/python-dis
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:47:33 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:16:53 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:12:40 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > to some extent, can't you do the same by unpacking
> > > > > > > > > > twice to differen
A semi-replacement for _python-distutils-ng_very_long_name...
Unlike the forementioned function, it returns just the binary name
and not the complete path. Thus, the executable rewrite in p-d-ng has
been changed to use #!/usr/bin/env.
---
gx86/eclass/python-distutils-ng.eclass | 28 --
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:16:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:12:40 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > to some extent, can't you do the same by unpacking
> > > > > > > > > twice to different $S and calling
> > > > > > > > > src_prepare/compile/install instead of
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:12:40 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > > > > > to some extent, can't you do the same by unpacking
> > > > > > > > twice to different $S and calling
> > > > > > > > src_prepare/compile/install instead of their
> > > > > > > > autotools-utils counterpart with tweaked $S so t
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:53:27 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:32:14 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:17:58 -0300
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:32:14 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:17:58 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:47:44 -0300
> > > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:17:58 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:47:44 -0300
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:21:20 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:47:44 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:21:20 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:46:02 -0300
> > > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/09/12 06:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since my previous idea of DYNAMIC_SLOTS proved too complex to
> design and implement, I would like to offer an another idea, based
> partially on what Ciaran mentioned. Before I start getting in
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
>> IE: - -'as-is' would be the generic "as-is" statement -
>> -'free-non-commercial' would be a "free/unrestricted for
>> non-commercial use" statement - -'free-unrestricted' would be a
>> statement of more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/09/12 09:15 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
>> IE: - -'as-is' would be the generic "as-is" statement -
>> -'free-non-commercial' would be a "free/unrestricted for
>> non-commercial use" statement - -'free-u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/09/12 06:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ulrich Mueller
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it's not clear from our documentation if the
>> LICENSE variable applies to the source tarball or to the files
>> that the package
Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
> IE: - -'as-is' would be the generic "as-is" statement -
> -'free-non-commercial' would be a "free/unrestricted for
> non-commercial use" statement - -'free-unrestricted' would be a
> statement of more or less public domain
>
> - -..etc...
Why not directly use the FSF
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I tend to interpret it in the latter sense. To illustrate why, let's
>> look at sci-visualization/gnuplot-4.6.0 as an example:
>>
>> LICENSE="gnuplot GPL-2 bitmap? ( free-noncomm )"
>>
>> The bulk of the package is free software, distributed unde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/09/12 08:10 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/23/2012 02:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> If we really decide to move things to a new license file, then
>> I'd rather avoid the name "as-is" because it is partly the reason
>> for the confusion.
>
> I
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Unfortunately, it's not clear from our documentation if the LICENSE
> variable applies to the source tarball or to the files that the
> package installs on the user's system.
Hmm, if these aren't the same, then more likely than not somethin
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> - net-misc/ntp: "as-is" looks fine as main license, although some
>> parts of the code are under different licenses like GPL (but I
>> haven't checked in detail what gets installed).
> Uh, if we're distributing the sources, and they contain GPL co
24 matches
Mail list logo
