Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI usage

2012-09-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/04/2012 05:06 PM, Brian Harring wrote: >> >> As a compromise, it could be made policy that "bump to EAPI=foo" bugs >> are valid. If someone would benefit from such a bump, he can file a bug >> and know that it won't be closed WONTFIX. On the other hand, the dev is >> under no more pressure th

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-04 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31-08-2012 20:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Also, we're getting rather a lot of *DEPEND variables here... If > we're making people make major changes to their deps, which for > HDEPEND we definitely would be, then the "it's expensive since > peopl

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI usage

2012-09-04 Thread Brian Harring
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:36:13AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/02/2012 09:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Andreas K. Huettel > > wrote: > >> What I dont actually understand at all is why bumping the EAPI should be so > >> complicated or involved that it e

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost.

2012-09-04 Thread Michał Górny
Now with a handy function for cmake & autotools! And a more complete description. --- gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass | 99 ++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass diff --git a/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass b/g

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> Just looking into the future here; would things like archivers or > other helpers used by src_unpack move to FDEPEND as well? or would > this be limited solely to tools that data transfer? We should keep the data transfer and the unpack phase clearly separated. So, this would best really be fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:56:54 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 04/09/12 01:32 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > > On 09/04/2012 10:05 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > >> I believe the easiest (and honestly most sane) method is to > >> simply have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/04/2012 03:56 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 04/09/12 01:32 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 09/04/2012 10:05 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >>> I believe the easiest (and honestly most sane) method is to >>> simply have src_fetch in the live c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/09/12 01:32 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 09/04/2012 10:05 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> I believe the easiest (and honestly most sane) method is to >> simply have src_fetch in the live classes check for needed deps >> and die (with a "pl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Zac Medico
On 09/04/2012 10:05 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > I believe the easiest (and honestly most sane) method is to simply have > src_fetch in the live classes check for needed deps and die (with a > "please emerge blah") if deps are not found. Adding something like > FDEPEND just seems to be ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 13:02:36 -0400 Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Michał Górny > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As Sid Hayn raised today on #gentoo-portage, it would be useful to > > finally have portage able to fetch updates from VCS-es independently > > of src_unpack(). This c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/04/2012 01:02 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hello, >> >> As Sid Hayn raised today on #gentoo-portage, it would be useful to >> finally have portage able to fetch updates from VCS-es independentl

Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5?

2012-09-04 Thread Zac Medico
On 09/04/2012 04:00 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 05:20:02PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote > >> This approach is fine imo, although I'd *potentially* look at adding a >> magic $PROC_COUNT var that is the # of cpu threads on the system; >> either that or defaulting jobs to it. >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/04/2012 12:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > As Sid Hayn raised today on #gentoo-portage, it would be useful to > finally have portage able to fetch updates from VCS-es independently > of src_unpack(). This could be used, for example, on m

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Michael Mol
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > As Sid Hayn raised today on #gentoo-portage, it would be useful to > finally have portage able to fetch updates from VCS-es independently > of src_unpack(). This could be used, for example, on machines > temporarily connected to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/04/2012 12:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > As Sid Hayn raised today on #gentoo-portage, it would be useful to If you insist on using real names mine is Rick ;-) > finally have portage able to fetch updates from VCS-es independently > of

[gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching

2012-09-04 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, As Sid Hayn raised today on #gentoo-portage, it would be useful to finally have portage able to fetch updates from VCS-es independently of src_unpack(). This could be used, for example, on machines temporarily connected to the network -- one would then fetch files while connected to the net

Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5? (was: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS)

2012-09-04 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 05:20:02PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote > This approach is fine imo, although I'd *potentially* look at adding a > magic $PROC_COUNT var that is the # of cpu threads on the system; > either that or defaulting jobs to it. > > I rather dislike requiring users to go jam a 2/4