Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5? (was: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS)

2012-09-01 Thread Michael Mol
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12:44AM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:45:21 +0100 >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:15 +0200 >> > Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> > > Coming back to this old topic [1]. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5? (was: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS)

2012-09-01 Thread Brian Harring
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12:44AM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:45:21 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:15 +0200 > > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > Coming back to this old topic [1]. Is there still consensus that we > > > should have such an EJO

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI usage

2012-09-01 Thread Brian Harring
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:58:00 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Of course an individual PM could choose to keep support for as long > > as they want, but unless I'm missing something, that'd let PMs drop > > supp

Re: [gentoo-dev] stripping escape sequences from build logs

2012-09-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:39:13 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I find the included escape sequences to be annoying when I am reading > a build log. > > Is there a way to strip these? I think the 'easy' way is to view them using 'less'. Not sure if it will work for you. -- Best regards, Mi

Re: [gentoo-dev] stripping escape sequences from build logs

2012-09-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/09/2012 15:39, William Hubbs wrote: > > I find the included escape sequences to be annoying when I am reading a > build log. > > Is there a way to strip these? I had that problem — you can find my script that does that (as well as other stuff) at https://github.com/gentoo/tboxanalysis --

[gentoo-dev] stripping escape sequences from build logs

2012-09-01 Thread William Hubbs
All, I find the included escape sequences to be annoying when I am reading a build log. Is there a way to strip these? Thanks, William pgp5HadawgmHT.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:15:16 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > This sounds more like a user-interface issue than a problem with > runtime-switchable USE flags (GLEP 62). The nice thing about > runtime-switchable USE flags is that makes it possible to allow users > to unify all of their optional dependency

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 09/01/2012 09:00 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:45:59 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/31/2012 04:07 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:03:25 -0700 >>> Zac Medico wrote: > runtime-switchable USE flags for optional dependencies o.O? It > sounds

Re: [gentoo-dev] Future Trends

2012-09-01 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 1. September 2012, 17:09:59 schrieb llemike...@aol.com: > Colleagues, > > I have been considering the current push to replace > init with systemd for all Linux systems. > [snip] > > Comments? > > Mike Please ignore. We've had enough pointless systemd threads already. -- Andreas K

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:45:59 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/31/2012 04:07 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:03:25 -0700 > > Zac Medico wrote: > >>> runtime-switchable USE flags for optional dependencies o.O? It > >>> sounds like using a spoon to eat spaghetti to me. > >> > >>

[gentoo-dev] Future Trends

2012-09-01 Thread llemike...@aol.com
Colleagues, I have been considering the current push to replace init with systemd for all Linux systems. systemd has been adopted by Fedora and openSuSE as the default init system - and to ensure it becomes the de facto standard, SysVInit has been deprecated to the extent it is now virtually uns

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: prune_libtool_files() and pkg-config dependency

2012-09-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:51:08 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: >> Such a goals may be good for distributions like Exherbo which aim to >> make everything perfect. I believe that Gentoo aims more around 'good >> enough but at least realistic', instead

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: prune_libtool_files() and pkg-config dependency

2012-09-01 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 09:40:47 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:14:43 -0400 > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > Ah, while we're at it. If a library has macros referring > > > to the functions of another library (or just types) in its public > > > API, it needs a pkg-config file. ELF

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 00:07:38 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:03:25 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > > > runtime-switchable USE flags for optional dependencies o.O? It > > > sounds like using a spoon to eat spaghetti to me. > > > > All suggested deps are not equal, so USE flags g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: prune_libtool_files() and pkg-config dependency

2012-09-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:14:43 -0400 Alexis Ballier wrote: > > Ah, while we're at it. If a library has macros referring > > to the functions of another library (or just types) in its public > > API, it needs a pkg-config file. ELF dependencies are not enough, > > and the gold linker will refuse to