On 27/08/12 16:46, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 27/08/2012 00:18, Samuli Suominen wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF works
for this
Because extremely simply I forgot to delete the line.
yep, as I guessed, thanks for clearing it (and just ignore rest of
Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:25:53 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>> [snip]
> Honestly, while I might agree with that sentiment on some of these
> threads, my only complaint with Ciaran's original response was that he
> c
2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
> +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> +# $Header: $
> +
> +if [[ ! ${_BOOST_ECLASS} ]]; then
> +
> +# @
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> That's all I'm saying. It's being made a whole lot less pleasant that it
> might be... for what reason? Just to satisfy someone's ego that they're
> right and can /force/ compliance? Yuck!
Honestly, while I might agree wit
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:33:42 +0100 as excerpted:
> No, you're utterly missing the point here. The spec is there to be
> followed, not battled and ignored unless a justification is provided at
> every step. When it comes to writing compliant ebuilds, PMS *is* the
> justificat
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 02:15 +0200, hasufell wrote:
> Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
> supports it?
>
> It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
> policy on this? Isn't this actually a bug?
For example, static linking is dis
On 27/08/2012 17:15, hasufell wrote:
> Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
> supports it?
Most libtool software "supports" static-libs, because libtool let you
build them, _but_ it might not be test or might not even work.
One example is software that relies o
Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
supports it?
It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
policy on this? Isn't this actually a bug?
Am Dienstag, 28. August 2012, 00:19:28 schrieb Michał Górny:
> Right now, it just contains the function Tiziano listed in his post[1].
> I'd appreciate further ideas, feedback, and possibly an example from
> someone who will actually need it.
How about a function that just outputs the entire requi
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:23:31 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:19:28 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > + has "${EAPI:-0}" 0 1 2 && ! use prefix && EPREFIX=
>
> Until EAPI 5 is available with support for IUSE_IMPLICIT, if you 'use
> prefix', then prefix has to be listed in IU
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:19:28 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> + has "${EAPI:-0}" 0 1 2 && ! use prefix && EPREFIX=
Until EAPI 5 is available with support for IUSE_IMPLICIT, if you 'use
prefix', then prefix has to be listed in IUSE.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Right now, it just contains the function Tiziano listed in his post[1].
I'd appreciate further ideas, feedback, and possibly an example from
someone who will actually need it.
---
gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass | 43 ++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
crea
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:28:45 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> not a problem for users of the official package manager.
> >
> > Cut it out. The Council makes the rules, not you, and the Council
> > says that PMS, not what works with one particular Portage version,
> > dictates
Hello,
$ quse -D adns ares
global:adns: Adds support for the adns DNS client library
local:ares:dev-libs/ecore: Enables support for asynchronous DNS using the
net-dns/c-ares library
local:ares:net-analyzer/wireshark: Use GNU net-dns/c-ares library to resolve
DNS names
local:ares:net-irc/znc:
On 27/08/2012 00:18, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF works
> for this
Because extremely simply I forgot to delete the line.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description
Third update; Alexis made a convincing argument that vala_pkg_setup
should be changed to vala_src_prepare.
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: vala.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# gn...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR:
#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/08/12 04:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> The bottom line here is: I don't think all of the services we have
> set up to "need net" in their default configuration should be set
> up that way. It would make OpenRC work out of the box for many
>
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:45:45 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:45 -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:43:32 -0400
> > Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > > The variables that vala_pkg_setup sets are needed only at build
> > > time.
> >
> > so it should
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:10:20 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:01:28 +0300 Samuli Suominen
> wrote:
>> On 27/08/12 10:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300 Samuli Suominen
>> > wrote:
>> >> why leave the ebuild read $myconf from glob
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:01:28 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 27/08/12 10:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF
> >> works for this
> >
> > As far as ebuilds are concerne
On 27/08/12 10:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF
works for this
As far as ebuilds are concerned, there is no such thing as EXTRA_ECONF.
you mean to say PMS fails to document
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF
> works for this
As far as ebuilds are concerned, there is no such thing as EXTRA_ECONF.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 27/08/12 04:52, Diego Petteno (flameeyes) wrote:
flameeyes12/08/27 01:52:43
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:gpa-0.9.3.ebuild
Removed: gpa-0.9.1_pre20100416-r1.ebuild
Log:
Version bump (thanks to Arfrever in bug #432636 for reporting). Simp
23 matches
Mail list logo
