On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Dale wrote:
> Now, since Walter didn't like the way things are going, can he write
> code and be left in peace to do so? Maybe have a little bit of support
> while he is doing it?
++
I can't say I think that preferring mdev over an initramfs is a good
choice, but
On Friday, August 03, 2012 07:16:45 AM Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 07:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > yes, and i'm waiting on the POSIX group to formalize C.UTF-8. that's the
only
> > real option in my mind for making unicode the default. any other
> > amalgamations of various locales
On 8 August 2012 01:58, Michał Górny wrote:
> I don't think that's possible. Much like with other kinds of updates,
> the packages in the tree would be updated to install in the new
> location anyway.
Sure, but the question is "when does this happen". Users are expecting
such changes when they em
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:31:32 -0400
> Michael Mol wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Michał Górny
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:33:59 -0400
>>> Sylvain Alain wrote:
>>>
The KDE team seems to work on that too :
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:31:32 -0400
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:33:59 -0400
> > Sylvain Alain wrote:
> >
> >> The KDE team seems to work on that too :
> >> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134052539215508&w=2
> >
>
Hi,
Let's cut the FUD.
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 08:47 -0400, Sylvain Alain wrote:
> 1. The SystemD and Udev projetcs are merged now, so what is the impact
> on the Gentoo on a short term period ?
Only the build system is merged, they're still separate binaries.
> 2. I saw on some lists that Gnome/
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:57 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
> Il 31/07/2012 21:27, Michał Górny ha scritto:
>> I'd be more afraid about resources, and whether the kernel will be
>> actually able to handle bazillion bind mounts. And if, whether it won't
>> actually cause more overhead than copying the
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:33:59 -0400
> Sylvain Alain wrote:
>
>> The KDE team seems to work on that too :
>> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134052539215508&w=2
>
> it's actually worth it.
> more user-spread FUD or however you like to c
On 07-08-2012 18:23:54 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't understand the problem. Is it a general problem with
> > the single quote or a special FreeBSD problem?
>
> A general problem. It won't work unless it's eval-ed. And if it were,
> there will be more harm than you can possibly ima
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:33:59 -0400
Sylvain Alain wrote:
> The KDE team seems to work on that too :
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134052539215508&w=2
it's actually worth it.
more user-spread FUD or however you like to call it on the topic than
I'm not sure if *devs* are actually worki
On 07-08-2012 18:03:14 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
> * "Fabian Groffen (grobian)" :
> > grobian 12/08/07 15:21:54
> >
> > Modified: ChangeLog
> > Added:XML-Parser-2.410.0-r1.ebuild
> > Log:
> > Fix expat detection for FreeBSD that silently went unnoticed.
>
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:03:14 +0200
Torsten Veller wrote:
> * "Fabian Groffen (grobian)" :
> > grobian 12/08/07 15:21:54
> >
> > Modified: ChangeLog
> > Added:XML-Parser-2.410.0-r1.ebuild
> > Log:
> > Fix expat detection for FreeBSD that silently went unnoti
* "Fabian Groffen (grobian)" :
> grobian 12/08/07 15:21:54
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:XML-Parser-2.410.0-r1.ebuild
> Log:
> Fix expat detection for FreeBSD that silently went unnoticed.
The following single quotes were dropped:
-myconf="EXPATLIBPATH='
The KDE team seems to work on that too :
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134052539215508&w=2
Now I understand why some devs are working hard to make Mdev working with
OpenRC.
They want to replace Udev/SystemD with Mdev/OpenRC and solve this situation.
Sylvain aka d2_racing
2012/8/7 Ric
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:48:01 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> I think any kind of large-scale directory moves are going to be risky
> on a distro like Gentoo. We should probably give them careful thought
> before implementing them. This isn't something like Ubuntu where you
> practically wipe and re-
Rich Freeman wrote:
> I suspect upstream would say that if you want a smooth desktop
> experience you shouldn't be running Gentoo. To some degree they
> probably even have a valid point.
Yes and no.. I think it will always be possible to use Gentoo to
create as smooth a desktop experience as any d
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> I don't think that's possible. Much like with other kinds of updates,
> the packages in the tree would be updated to install in the new
> location anyway.
>
If I were faced with doing this manually I know the first thing I'd do
is run quickp
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Yes, but if the upstream that is Gnome decides to start depending on
> systemd features then that's their decision, and the place to discuss
> if it's good or bad (more important, the place to change it!) would
> be within the Gnome project.
M
Rich Freeman wrote:
> In the future it might be much harder to run Gnome on Gentoo on an OSX
> kernel, etc.
Yes, but if the upstream that is Gnome decides to start depending on
systemd features then that's their decision, and the place to discuss
if it's good or bad (more important, the place to c
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:10:35 +0200
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Rather than adding a prompt for the user to have to care about
> (everyone will answer yes all the time or no all the time anyway)
> I suggest that the action be made easy to undo, so that when
> something breaks it is possible and indeed eas
# Michael Palimaka (7 Aug 2012)
# Fails to build with GCC 4.7 (bug #430250)
# Bundles utilities from dev-util/pccts
# Dead upstream. Removal in 30 days.
dev-util/
Hello developers,
for the last few years I have been maintaining
x11-drivers/xf86-video-openchrome as best as I could. I was basing most
of that work on my extensive use (in a workstation of sorts) of a single
VIA EPIA M-1 mainboard for a period of more than seven years, but it
proved in
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote:
> Hi everyone, for a couple of months now, I see on the list some of
> activities about OpenRC been ported to FreeBSD or OpenRC to Debian and other
> stuff related to SystemD.
>
You and half the world. Most of the issues you raise are much big
Kent Fredric wrote:
> I suggest, that due to the volatility of such actions, a user should
> have to approve each bulk move before it is done, to avoid breaking
> things.
Further thoughts about this:
* The move is needed for some reason.
* The person running emerge will in the common case not kn
Hi everyone, for a couple of months now, I see on the list some of
activities about OpenRC been ported to FreeBSD or OpenRC to Debian and
other stuff related to SystemD.
I have some basic questions about all that :
1. The SystemD and Udev projetcs are merged now, so what is the impact on
the Gent
On 08/07/2012 06:00 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
"Andreas K. Huettel" writes:
# Andreas K. Huettel (7 Aug 2012)
# Many display bugs and compatibility problems, does not build with cups-1.6.
# Upstream is dead. There's no real way to support this anymore. Masked for
# removal in 30 days.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
# Andreas K. Huettel (7 Aug 2012)
# Many display bugs and compatibility problems, does not build with cups-1.6.
# Upstream is dead. There's no real way to support this anymore. Masked for
# removal in 30 days. Unfortunately the best lightweight repla
On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:12:47 +0200
"Federico \"fox\" Scrinzi" wrote:
> We already received some suggestions and we implmented some of them,
> but we'd like to receive more detailed feedback about:
>
> - Mail newsletter: would you like to have it? which info would you
> like to receive specifical
On 7 August 2012 19:52, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now, every time a bigger bunch of stuff (installed by various
> packages) needs to be moved around the filesystem, we have a lot of
> work to handle it somehow. And finally, users end up having to either
> rebuild a lot of packages to
Hi!
I'm Federico and I'm working for this year's Google Summer of Code on
the euscan project with Corentin Chary.
euscan is a tool to automatically scan upstream and find out if some
packages in gentoo are outdated and should be bumped.
We're working on a dashboard for maintainers where will be po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
> I remember when xpdf was removed, epdfview was recommended as a
> lightweight alternative. How about this time?
Have you gave a try to app-text/mupdf?
It is very lightweight and does not depends on poppler.
- --
Cyprien
Hello,
Right now, every time a bigger bunch of stuff (installed by various
packages) needs to be moved around the filesystem, we have a lot of
work to handle it somehow. And finally, users end up having to either
rebuild a lot of packages to get the files in the new locations, or
we do ugly things
On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:00:13 +0900
hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Andreas K. Huettel" writes:
>
> > # Andreas K. Huettel (7 Aug 2012)
> > # Many display bugs and compatibility problems, does not build with
> > cups-1.6. # Upstream is dead. There's no real way to support this
> > anymore.
33 matches
Mail list logo
