On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:07:58 +1200
Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 27 June 2012 19:51, Federico "fox" Scrinzi wrote:
> > The main question is: what would you like to have on this dashboard?
> > Currently (in the development version) there's the possibility to
> > login and watch/unwatch packages/catego
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2012 00:15:59 Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
>> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
>> I don't do much work on base system
Mike Frysinger posted on Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:12:38 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2012 00:04:35 Duncan wrote:
>> I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that
>> was a part of @system and that thus would have likely had a default in
>> the profiles packages file,
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 23:59:02 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 June 2012 17:35:00 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:02:40 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of vari
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 23:27:06 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 06:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 June 2012 22:46:26 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 06/15/2012 06:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Friday 15 June 2012 03:44:14 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 06
Kent Fredric posted on Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:07:58 +1200 as excerpted:
> For the most part it seems to get upstream / portage versioning right,
> but occasionally you get miss-matches for some reason.
>
> It would be nice to allow to provide some mapping mechanism that existed
> on the overlay itse
On Thursday 21 June 2012 03:00:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> In case you're not aware, the first time Gentoo did multilib, it was
> done as a series of random changes to Portage that no-one really
> thought through or understood. As you can see, that didn't work...
yes yes, it's very easy to throw r
On Thursday 21 June 2012 08:11:27 Homer Parker wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > In case you're not aware, the first time Gentoo did multilib, it was
> > done as a series of random changes to Portage that no-one really
> > thought through or understood. As you c
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 16:25:30 Richard Yao wrote:
> Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
Thomas already has multilib documents put together for review. multiarch
doesn't make sense for us, and even if it did, there's no way it'd be spec-ed
out in a reasonable time frame for EAPI=5 (or even 6
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 16:39:42 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> > Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
>
> Sorry for a possibly ignorant question. Does multilib support include
> the ability to build Busybox against uclibc (on a glibc system)?
i'm
On Sunday 24 June 2012 04:18:07 Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 24 June 2012 02:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 June 2012 13:37:59 Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >> +for x in ${LANGS}; do
> >> + IUSE+=" linguas_${x}"
> >> +done
> >
> > if you don't want to make it into an array:
> > IUSE+=
On Monday 25 June 2012 00:15:59 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
> I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
> advice on how to make this a
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 00:04:35 Duncan wrote:
> Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:13:09 -0400 as excerpted:
> > Profiles do not set a "default bootloader" so I have no idea what you
> > are talking about.
>
> I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that was
> a pa
On Thursday 28 June 2012 04:22:22 Naohiro Aota wrote:
> Diego Elio Pettenò writes:
> > I'm going to give up maintainership of a few packages simply because I'm
> > not using it any longer and thus I can't care about them as much as I
> > should:
> >
> > dev-util/perf
>
> I take this one.
i thin
On 27 June 2012 19:51, Federico "fox" Scrinzi wrote:
> The main question is: what would you like to have on this dashboard?
> Currently (in the development version) there's the possibility to login
> and watch/unwatch packages/categories/herds/... and see the watched
> stuff in the account dashboa
I was doing a fresh Gentoo install today, following the manual, and it
appeared to me that the manual suggests to install a "logger" and a
"cron", and gives some defacto suggestions.
However, the available packages that provide this facility(s) are not
overly obvious from a portage standpoint.
Th
BTW this is bug 379837, so there was no hurry :-P
Il 25/06/2012 14:55, Samuli Suominen ha scritto:
Open a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ instead of mailing here.
Yeah, I know bugzilla is down but it's only temporary.
- Samuli
On 06/25/2012 02:54 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
neither stable tdb
El jue, 28-06-2012 a las 10:26 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:12:34 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> > The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1].
>
> Define 'perfect'.
>
> > To clarify:
> >
> > Use `prune_libtool_files --all` instead of plain
> > `prune_libto
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:29:49 +0200
Michael Weber wrote:
> - - a Report problem machanism.
>i.e. on http://euscan.iksaif.net/maintainers/48/ there's an
>inconsistency between both "upstream" and "version in gentoo"
>being 2012.2.0 but there's still a light red marker.
And in the same
> I'd like to see the information regarding current tree state updated
> more regularly than the full upstream scan. Especially when looking at
> the herd view, it can be hard to keep track of which bumps have already
> been completed.
Good idea- it should be much cheaper to do the tree update tha
On 2012-06-27 17:51, Federico "fox" Scrinzi wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'm working on a GSoC project for enhancing Euscan
(http://euscan.iksaif.net/). Euscan allows to check if a given
package/ebuild has new upstream versions or not. It uses different
heuristic to scan upstream and grab new versions a
Diego Elio Pettenò writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm going to give up maintainership of a few packages simply because I'm
> not using it any longer and thus I can't care about them as much as I
> should:
>
> dev-util/perf
I take this one.
Regards,
pgprI0AlBjP3H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:12:34 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1].
Define 'perfect'.
> To clarify:
>
> Use `prune_libtool_files --all` instead of plain
> `prune_libtool_files` if you don't test the package with the USE
> flags.
Sounds like abuse of
23 matches
Mail list logo
