The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-06-17 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-libs/libPropList2012-06-14 15:45:59 ssuominen
app-pda/synce-connector 2012-06-15 09:24:10 ssuominen
dev-libs/lib
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 17.06.2012 20:56, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
>> I was under the impression that it should at least help in that scenario.
>> OTOH, if it takes a compromised system or physical access to the machine in
>> order to manipulate the boot sequence,
On Saturday 16 June 2012 08:12:13 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I would like to know if there is some place where things going to be
> > included (or proposed to be included) for eapi5 are listed (if such
> > place exists). Currently, looks like there is
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:38:50 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:31:59 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > A simple solution to a program long-unsolved. In GLEP form.
> >
> > Both attached and published as a gist:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/2945569
>
> Do you have an implem
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:31:59 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> A simple solution to a program long-unsolved. In GLEP form.
>
> Both attached and published as a gist:
>
> https://gist.github.com/2945569
Do you have an implementation we can play with?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: P
Hello,
A simple solution to a program long-unsolved. In GLEP form.
Both attached and published as a gist:
https://gist.github.com/2945569
(please note that github doesn't render GLEP headers correctly)
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
GLEP: XXX
Title: Optional runtime dependencies via runtime-sw
Am 17.06.2012 20:56, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> On Sunday, 17. June 2012 20:00:51 Florian Philipp wrote:
>> Am 17.06.2012 19:34, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
>>> [...]
>>>
It doesn't. It's just a very long wooden fence; you just didn't find
the hole yet.
>>>
>>> Given the fact that the keys in the BI
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> Huh? No, why would a user need to resign the UEFI drivers? Those
> "live" in the BIOS and are only used to get the machine up and running
> in UEFI space, before UEFI hands the control off to the bootloader it
> has verified is signed with a corr
Sascha Cunz writes:
> You've said yourself, that "some removable media might not require
> signatures"
> in order to boot. Well, if that is the case, then isn't this defeating the
> whole point of Secure Boot at that stage?
Not necessarily. As has been stated previously, secure boot is not
in
On Sunday, 17. June 2012 20:00:51 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 17.06.2012 19:34, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> > [...]
> >
> >> It doesn't. It's just a very long wooden fence; you just didn't find
> >> the hole yet.
> >
> > Given the fact that the keys in the BIOS must somehow get there and it
> > must
>
Am 17.06.2012 19:34, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> [...]
>
>> It doesn't. It's just a very long wooden fence; you just didn't find
>> the hole yet.
>
> Given the fact that the keys in the BIOS must somehow get there and it must
> also be able to update them (how to revoke or add keys else?).
>
> Unles
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:06:16PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:55:35 -0700
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > 2. What happens if, say, your bootloader is compromised?
> >
> > And how would this happen? Your bootload
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Sascha Cunz wrote:
>
> Given the fact that the keys in the BIOS must somehow get there and it must
> also be able to update them (how to revoke or add keys else?).
Based on what I've read the keys are stored in flash. The flash
module itself is protected. There
Thomas Sachau posted on Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:02:26 +0200 as excerpted:
> I suggest you look for a better client to handle the line wrapping
> better. ;-) In the meantime, the same file attached with wrapped lines.
Thanks. (And I'm actually involved upstream tho not as a coder, so
maybe...)
--
Am 17.06.2012 19:10, schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:56:34 -0400
> Matthew Finkel wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Michał Górny
>> wrote:
>>> 1. How does it increase security?
>>>
>> This removed a few vectors of attack and ensures your computer is only
>> bootstrappe
[...]
> It doesn't. It's just a very long wooden fence; you just didn't find
> the hole yet.
Given the fact that the keys in the BIOS must somehow get there and it must
also be able to update them (how to revoke or add keys else?).
Unless this is completely done in hardware, there must be a sof
Am 17.06.2012 19:06, schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:55:35 -0700
> Greg KH wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
[...]
>
>>> 3. What happens if the machine signing the blobs is compromised?
>>
>> So, who's watching the watchers, right? Come on,
Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 06:37:41PM -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Just picking a random response to reply to. I'm not speaking
>> officially, however, I'm pretty sure we at Genesi aren't going to pay
>> Microsoft in order to boot our own boards.
> If you don't want your board
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:55:35 -0700
> Greg KH wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > 2. What happens if, say, your bootloader is compromised?
>>
>> And how would this happen? Your bootloader would not r
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:56:34 -0400
Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > 1. How does it increase security?
> >
> This removed a few vectors of attack and ensures your computer is only
> bootstrapped by and booted using software you think is safe. By
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:55:35 -0700
Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > 2. What happens if, say, your bootloader is compromised?
>
> And how would this happen? Your bootloader would not run.
Yes. I'm asking what happens next. Is there an easy way t
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:22:24PM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > I think that anybody that really cares about security should be
> > running in custom mode anyway, and should just re-sign anything they
> > want to run. Custom mode lets you
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 06:37:41PM -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Just picking a random response to reply to. I'm not speaking
> officially, however, I'm pretty sure we at Genesi aren't going to pay
> Microsoft in order to boot our own boards.
If you don't want your boards to be Windows 8 cer
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:20:38 +0200
> Florian Philipp wrote:
>
> > Am 16.06.2012 19:51, schrieb Michał Górny:
> > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:54:12 +0200
> > > Florian Philipp wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am 15.06.2012 06:50, schrieb Duncan:
> > >>> Gr
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:20:38 +0200
> Florian Philipp wrote:
>
> > Am 16.06.2012 19:51, schrieb Michał Górny:
> > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:54:12 +0200
> > > Florian Philipp wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am 15.06.2012 06:50, schrieb Duncan:
>
Michał Górny schrieb:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0200
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
Beside that, it seems to solve things pretty similar to the
proposed way in multilib-portage for cross-compiling (which could
also be adapted for multi-slot languages) with different wording
an
2012/6/17 Michał Górny :
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:03:22 +0400
> Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>
>> 2012/6/17 Justin :
>> > On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>> >> 2012/6/17 Justin :
>> >>> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-fla
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >> Beside that, it seems to solve things pretty similar to the
> >> proposed way in multilib-portage for cross-compiling (which could
> >> also be adapted for multi-slot languages) with different wording
> >> and with additional work for e
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:20:38 +0200
Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 16.06.2012 19:51, schrieb Michał Górny:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:54:12 +0200
> > Florian Philipp wrote:
> >
> >> Am 15.06.2012 06:50, schrieb Duncan:
> >>> Greg KH posted on Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:28:10 -0700 as excerpted:
> >>>
> >>
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:03:22 +0400
Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> 2012/6/17 Justin :
> > On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> >> 2012/6/17 Justin :
> >>> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> Hi,
> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L
> and -I flags fr
Michał Górny schrieb:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:09:14 +0200
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> Michał Górny schrieb:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This
>>> is my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages
>>> for multiple Python and R
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:51:50 +0200
Marien Zwart wrote:
> A common operation in an ebuild will be (say) "get the selected
> version of python". That's easy enough if there's only one kind of
> dynamic slot being used by the ebuild (just use CURRENT_SLOTS
> directly), but if the ebuild supports mor
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:43:30 +0200
Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 09:26 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view
> > it rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list,
> > rather than forking the gist.
>
>
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:09:14 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This
> > is my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages
> > for multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also
2012/6/17 Justin :
> On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>> 2012/6/17 Justin :
>>> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
Hi,
During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
bootstrapping.
On 17-06-2012 16:13:33 +0400, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> Hi,
> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
> flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
> bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to
> make it preserve prefix-related fla
On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> 2012/6/17 Justin :
>> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
>>> flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
>>> bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix
2012/6/17 Richard Yao :
> On 06/17/2012 09:23 AM, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>> Don't tell me that OpenBSD prefix is unsupported, i'm working on
>> getting it supported.
>
> OpenBSD is listed on the platform matrix, but it has lacked a maintainer
> for quite some time:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/g
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:26:55 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This is
> my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages for
> multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also be reused for
> multilib.
I'm pretty sure we ca
2012/6/17 Justin :
> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
>> flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
>> bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to
>
> Is this really ne
On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> Hi,
> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
> flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
> bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to
Is this really necessary? I never experienced
The following packages will be removed from the tree:
# Mask for removal (#421461)
# Test suite fails since perl 5.13.6
dev-perl/Tie-RegexpHash
# Mask for removal (#310711)
# vulture is the only consumer of =dev-perl/DBD-SQLite-0.31*
net-proxy/vulture
Hi,
During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to
make it preserve prefix-related flags. I have attached a patch, please
review it. It works for m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 03:35:08 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 08:14 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Suggested dependencies were used in the old kdebuilds, and Exherbo
> > makes extensive use of both suggested and recommended dependencies,
> > so
Michał Górny schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This is
> my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages for
> multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also be reused for multilib.
>
> The spec tries to explain the broad idea,
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 22:10 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > I guess the point is that it is not really a dependency.
> >
> > No, it's a dependency only when you want ppp support working,
>
> Logically, but not technically.
>
> I like this separation; the package manage
Duncan schrieb:
> Thomas Sachau posted on Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:31:40 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> Since i am not that sure about my ability to write formal specs, i am
>> presenting my first draft for further review and suggestions for
>> improvement.
>
> Just a format suggestion. Call it nitpicky if
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 22:07 -0500, Dale escribió:
> Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the broader picture, the problem of extraneous packages in the
> > world file has always concerned me. If it were to be done over again,
> > and I think Zac would likely agree, emerge would use --oneshot by
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 22:36 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:49:10 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 19:07 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > > On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:30:55 +0200
> > > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > >
> > > > El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 18:0
Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > I think ABI fits well though? The situation is that A DEPENDs on B,
> > and at some point B changes in a way that A must be rebuilt in order
> > to run - right?
>
> At least for dev-ruby/nokogiri this is not the case. It checks the
> version of libxml2 it was built agains
On zo, 2012-06-17 at 09:26 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
> rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
> than forking the gist.
I've only thought about this a little, but some thoughts so far:
A common
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 09:26 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
> rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
> than forking the gist.
I don't like the approach taken in 6. I'd rather state that there should
Am 16.06.2012 19:51, schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:54:12 +0200
> Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>> Am 15.06.2012 06:50, schrieb Duncan:
>>> Greg KH posted on Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:28:10 -0700 as excerpted:
>>>
So, anyone been thinking about this? I have, and it's not pretty.
>
Hello,
I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This is
my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages for
multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also be reused for multilib.
The spec tries to explain the broad idea, and all problems relevant to
it. It
On 06/17/2012 10:12 AM, Naohiro Aota (naota) wrote:
naota 12/06/17 07:12:19
Modified: ChangeLog
Log:
Add ~x86-fbsd. #419621
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha110/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Revision ChangesPath
1.261media-gfx/graphviz/ChangeLog
file :
http
55 matches
Mail list logo
