On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:45:55 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> Can you explain how Exherbo is handling dbus-glib rebuilds after
> glib:2 updates?
Badly, most likely.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 05:17, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2012 15:40:18 Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>>> i'm pleased to announce the initial x32 release candidate:
>>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/x32/stage3-amd64-x32-20120605.tar.xz
>>
>> Also plea
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:21:40 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> > You'd have a slot per ABI, and be encouraged to allow multiple
> > versions of glib to be installed in parallel. If you really
> > couldn't do that (and you should think very carefully before saying
> > you can't, since this directly affects
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 02:14:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> v4
committed with test cases
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 15:40:18 Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> > i'm pleased to announce the initial x32 release candidate:
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/x32/stage3-amd64-x32-20120605.tar.xz
>
> Also pleased to hear this! Thanks! Can't wait to find the time to play
> with it. Did you do all
On 06/06/2012 12:23 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:16:05 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> Well, I think reading this thread is more or less clear what it would
>> be supposed to do, also Zac suggested it and looks to have an idea
>> about what should it do.
>
> There's a big lea
On 06/06/2012 02:59 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
>>> Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
>>> revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
>>> with
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> > Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
> > revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
> > with tests)?
>
> I'd suggest a special ebuild phase
On 06/06/2012 10:19 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:32:08 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> We do? Please tell us. I was under the impression that we still
>>> didn't fully know what the problem was.
>>
>> Well, could you please let me know how to handle some issues already
>> men
On 06/06/2012 10:16 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:48:26 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> That looks nice, only two notes:
>> - Looks like would be more sense on distinguish between "SLOT" and
>> ABI_SLOT, for example:
>> * dbus-glib would rdepend on glib:2
>> * if glib
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:50:01PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> then when they do upgrade to new xulrunner, it's possible to package it
> from firefox tarball
> mozilla upstream doesn't support this, but some other distribs are
> packaging it[1]
>
> [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra
Il 06/06/2012 21:40, Gregory M. Turner ha scritto:
- Original Message -
i'm pleased to announce the initial x32 release candidate:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/x32/stage3-amd64-x32-20120605.tar.xz
Also pleased to hear this! Thanks! Can't wait to find the time to play with
it. Did y
- Original Message -
> i'm pleased to announce the initial x32 release candidate:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/x32/stage3-amd64-x32-20120605.tar.xz
Also pleased to hear this! Thanks! Can't wait to find the time to play with
it. Did you do all that work yourself? Is there a wiki or
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 20:23 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:16:05 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Well, I think reading this thread is more or less clear what it would
> > be supposed to do, also Zac suggested it and looks to have an idea
> > about what should it do.
>
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:16:05 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Well, I think reading this thread is more or less clear what it would
> be supposed to do, also Zac suggested it and looks to have an idea
> about what should it do.
There's a big leap from "more or less clear" and "an idea" to the kind
of k
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 14:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2012 14:06:47 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > The problem is that grep keeps linked against libpcre and it can cause
> > problems like pointed in referred bug report, and it's really risky as
> > people can have their port
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 19:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:30:52 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > Also, how could this be handled in dbus-glib side? I mean, would
> > > > we need to update dbus-glib update from RDEPENDing on glib:2.30 to
> > > > glib:2.32? :O
> > >
On 06/06/2012 08:28 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:19:58PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen (06 Jun 2012)
# Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415
# Removal in 30 days
What do we do about other apps that are XULRunner based, and NOT
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 14:06:47 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> The problem is that grep keeps linked against libpcre and it can cause
> problems like pointed in referred bug report, and it's really risky as
> people can have their portage completely broken for example when libpcre
> is downgraded for some
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:30:52 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > Also, how could this be handled in dbus-glib side? I mean, would
> > > we need to update dbus-glib update from RDEPENDing on glib:2.30 to
> > > glib:2.32? :O
> >
> > Noo. You'd use := dependencies, possibly with a >= constraint.
>
>
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 19:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:02:24 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Probably other gnome team could reply this better than me, but I don't
> > think slotting every glib-2 due ABI changes deserves the huge effort.
>
> Think of the users.
I
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:02:24 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Probably other gnome team could reply this better than me, but I don't
> think slotting every glib-2 due ABI changes deserves the huge effort.
Think of the users.
> Also, we want people to rebuild them against, for example, glib-2.32
> ABI,
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 13:23 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2012 04:26:11 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
> > support by default, specially after reading "man grep" and seeing that
> > its support is tagged as
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 18:19 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:32:08 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > We do? Please tell us. I was under the impression that we still
> > > didn't fully know what the problem was.
> >
> > Well, could you please let me know how to handle so
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 18:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:48:26 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > That looks nice, only two notes:
> > - Looks like would be more sense on distinguish between "SLOT" and
> > ABI_SLOT, for example:
> > * dbus-glib would rdepend on glib
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:19:58PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (06 Jun 2012)
> # Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415
> # Removal in 30 days
> http://open-ils.org/)
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 04:26:11 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
> support by default, specially after reading "man grep" and seeing that
> its support is tagged as experimental:
>-P, --perl-regexp
> Interpret PAT
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:32:08 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > We do? Please tell us. I was under the impression that we still
> > didn't fully know what the problem was.
>
> Well, could you please let me know how to handle some issues already
> mentioned? For example:
> - Rebuild dbus-glib and gobjec
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:48:26 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> That looks nice, only two notes:
> - Looks like would be more sense on distinguish between "SLOT" and
> ABI_SLOT, for example:
> * dbus-glib would rdepend on glib:2
> * if glib:2 abi changes, we would pull a ABI_SLOT="2.32"
> insi
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 02:00:34 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if no one else has feedback, i guess merge it
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/ChangeLog,v <-- ChangeLog
new revision: 1.291; previous revision: 1.290
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/eutils.eclass,v <-- eutils.eclass
new revision: 1.395;
On 06/06/2012 05:12 PM, Duncan wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:37:17 +0300 as excerpted:
# Jory A. Pratt (06 Jun 2012)
# Upstream discontinued security support for 3.6 series.
# If you still need these, now is the time to copy them
# Enigmail now installed with thunderbird
On 06/06/2012 05:07 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen (06 Jun 2012)
# Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415
# Removal in 30 days
Why a version dependent mask? There's nothing>2.0.1-r1 in the tree.
Ulrich
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/06/12 10:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>> # Samuli Suominen (06 Jun 2012) #
>> Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415 #
>> Removal in 30 days
> Why a version depende
Samuli Suominen posted on Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:37:17 +0300 as excerpted:
> # Jory A. Pratt (06 Jun 2012)
> # Upstream discontinued security support for 3.6 series.
> # If you still need these, now is the time to copy them
> # Enigmail now installed with thunderbird with crypt useflag.
> # to your
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (06 Jun 2012)
> # Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415
> # Removal in 30 days
> 2.0.1-r1 in the tree.
Ulrich
# Samuli Suominen (06 Jun 2012)
# Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415
# Removal in 30 days
# Jory A. Pratt (06 Jun 2012)
# Upstream discontinued security support for 3.6 series.
# If you still need these, now is the time to copy them
# Enigmail now installed with thunderbird with crypt useflag.
# to your local overlay.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
=mail-client/thunderbird-3.1*
x11-
On 06/06/2012 02:48 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 02:17 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
>> On 06/06/2012 01:28 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 16:07 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
The "SLOT operator" dependencies that Ciaran has been advocating are
very cl
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 02:17 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/06/2012 01:28 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 16:07 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> >> The "SLOT operator" dependencies that Ciaran has been advocating are
> >> very close to a good solution. However, if we want it
On 06/06/2012 02:10 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 01:54 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
>> Is there any chance to detec
On 06/06/2012 01:28 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 16:07 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
>> The "SLOT operator" dependencies that Ciaran has been advocating are
>> very close to a good solution. However, if we want it to work with
>> unslotted packages, then we need to introduce a se
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 01:54 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> >> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> >>> Is there any chance to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
>> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
>>> Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
>>> revdep-rebuild (worst case: ad
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 10:37 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió:
> On 6/6/12 10:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > After reading:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419795
> >
> > I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
> > support by default, specially afte
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> > Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
> > revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
> > with tests)?
>
> I'd suggest a special ebuild phase
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 02:51 +0200, Michael Weber escribió:
[...]
>
> [1] if you forget the -X on module-rebuild, you might no longer have
> the virtualbox-modules version installed in the tree (no packages
> satisfy ...). virtualbox does remove old versions real quick.
>
> The fun part comes w
On 6/6/12 10:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> After reading:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419795
>
> I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
> support by default, specially after reading "man grep" and seeing that
> its support is tagged as experimental:
T
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 06:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:31:01 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > We all know what would be the "ideal solution", the problem is how to
> > implement it (and how many years we need to wait to get it working).
>
> We do? Please tell us. I
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 16:07 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/05/2012 06:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 08:44 -0400, Aaron W. Swenson escribió:
> >> The ideal solution is for the Ebuild to instruct the PMS to rebuild
> >> the dependent packages.
> >>
> >> We can have a
After reading:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419795
I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
support by default, specially after reading "man grep" and seeing that
its support is tagged as experimental:
-P, --perl-regexp
Interpret PATT
This includes gtkdocize, gnome-doc-prepare & glib-gettextize.
---
gx86/eclass/autotools.eclass | 25 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gx86/eclass/autotools.eclass b/gx86/eclass/autotools.eclass
index 2d165e0..30f2ac5 100644
--- a/gx86/eclas
51 matches
Mail list logo
