On 06/02/2012 10:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 02 June 2012 19:59:02 Brian Harring wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> # @FUNCTION: multijob_post_fork
>>> # @DESCRIPTION:
>>> # You must call this in the parent process after forking a child proc
On 06/02/2012 08:52 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>> "ZM" == Zac Medico writes:
>
> Thanks for the quick reply and the reference to the bz.
>
> ZM> We had a bug about that [1] when we first deployed md5-cache, but it's
> ZM> supposed to have been fixed.
>
> It is not fixed. The behavior has not c
v3
-mike
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: multiprocessing.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# base-sys...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR:
# Brian Harring
# Mike Frysinger
# @BLURB: parallelization with bash (wtf?)
# @DE
On Saturday 02 June 2012 19:59:02 Brian Harring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > # @FUNCTION: multijob_post_fork
> > # @DESCRIPTION:
> > # You must call this in the parent process after forking a child process.
> > # If the parallel limit has been hit, it
> "ZM" == Zac Medico writes:
Thanks for the quick reply and the reference to the bz.
ZM> We had a bug about that [1] when we first deployed md5-cache, but it's
ZM> supposed to have been fixed.
It is not fixed. The behavior has not changed in any way since md5-cache was
added.
ZM> [1] htt
On 06/02/2012 06:04 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 04:47 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:50:06PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2012 02:31 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:54:03 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> # @FUNCTION: redire
On 06/02/2012 04:47 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:50:06PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/02/2012 02:31 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:54:03 -0400
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>
# @FUNCTION: redirect_alloc_fd
# @USAGE: [redirection]
#
On 06/02/2012 05:32 PM, James Cloos wrote:
> What's up with md5-cache?
>
> Every syn has to pull the entire md5-cache hierarchy over again, as if
> some daemon re-creates every file every day, rather than only re-writing
> those files which need updates and adding/removing those which need that.
What's up with md5-cache?
Every syn has to pull the entire md5-cache hierarchy over again, as if
some daemon re-creates every file every day, rather than only re-writing
those files which need updates and adding/removing those which need that.
Even if only the files metatdata changes, that still
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> # @FUNCTION: multijob_post_fork
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # You must call this in the parent process after forking a child process.
> # If the parallel limit has been hit, it will wait for one to finish and
> # return the child's exit stat
On Saturday 02 June 2012 19:29:29 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 02:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 June 2012 16:39:16 Zac Medico wrote:
> >> On 06/02/2012 12:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> if [[ ! -L /dev/fd/${fd} ]] ; then
> >>> e
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:50:06PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 02:31 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:54:03 -0400
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> >> # @FUNCTION: redirect_alloc_fd
> >> # @USAGE: [redirection]
> >> # @DESCRIPTION:
> >
> > (...and a lot of code)
>
On 06/02/2012 02:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 02 June 2012 16:39:16 Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/02/2012 12:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> if [[ ! -L /dev/fd/${fd} ]] ; then
>>> eval "exec ${fd}${redir}'${file}'" && break
>>>
On 06/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:54:03 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> # @FUNCTION: redirect_alloc_fd
>> # @USAGE: [redirection]
>> # @DESCRIPTION:
>
> (...and a lot of code)
>
> I may be wrong but wouldn't it be simpler to just stick with a named
> pipe
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:54:03 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> # @FUNCTION: redirect_alloc_fd
> # @USAGE: [redirection]
> # @DESCRIPTION:
(...and a lot of code)
I may be wrong but wouldn't it be simpler to just stick with a named
pipe here? Well, at first glance you wouldn't be able to read exactl
On Saturday 02 June 2012 16:39:16 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 12:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > if [[ ! -L /dev/fd/${fd} ]] ; then
> > eval "exec ${fd}${redir}'${file}'" && break
> > fi
>
> I launched up a GhostBSD livedvd
Masked until fixed or removed:
# Install perl modules in the site branch (#280728)
# - dev-perl/Cflow (#391391)
# - dev-lang/eleven (#295118)
# - net-im/silc-client (#294854)
dev-perl/Cflow
dev-lang/eleven
net-im/silc-client
On 06/02/2012 12:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> # @FUNCTION: redirect_alloc_fd
> # @USAGE: [redirection]
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # Find a free fd and redirect the specified file via it. Store the new
> # fd in the specified variable. Useful for the cases where we don't care
> # about the exact fd
v2
-mike
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: multiprocessing.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# base-sys...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR:
# Brian Harring
# Mike Frysinger
# @BLURB: parallelization with bash (wtf?)
# @DE
On 06/02/2012 10:28 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/2012 07:47 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I think you meant base/package.use.mask
correct, fixed.
and how about using ChangeLog?
I did that in gentoo-x86/base (theres an ChangeLog file)
but I d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/2012 07:47 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I think you meant base/package.use.mask
correct, fixed.
> and how about using ChangeLog?
I did that in gentoo-x86/base (theres an ChangeLog file)
but I didn't see anu ChangeLog in gentoo-x86/profiles/
On Saturday 02 June 2012 05:52:01 David Leverton wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > exec {mj_control_fd}<>${mj_control_pipe}
>
> I'll have to remember that feature, but unfortunately it's new in bash
> 4.1, so unless we're giving up 3.2 as the minimum for the tree
lame
> > : $(( ++mj
I think you meant base/package.use.mask and how about using ChangeLog?
On 06/02/2012 07:58 PM, Michael Weber (xmw) wrote:
xmw 12/06/02 16:58:09
Modified: package.use.mask
Log:
dev-db/firebird client
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 profiles/default/l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Is there any way to verify the data?
What programs/scripts use these fields btw?
I could imagine a test like (i.e. $a )
does http://www.fs.net/$a exist.
Michael
- --
Gentoo Dev
http://xmw.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17
* Corentin Chary :
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On 13 May 2012 07:43, Torsten Veller wrote:
> >> It doesn't even list "Moose" for Moose?
> >
> > Its probably falling outside the initial 10 results, I forgot it did that,
> >
> >> 02packages.details.txt.gz lists 72 pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2012 06:48 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2012 22:50:10 hasufell wrote:
>> On 06/02/2012 12:49 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 23 May 2012 21:04:42 hasufell wrote:
# @FUNCTION: _iconins # @DESCRIPTION: # function
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> It appears that devs will have to add the remote for the live
>> repository after they've cloned the bundle - otherwise they'll just
>> keep pulling from the bundle which isn't all tha
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Looks useful. Wasn't aware that a bundle was something other than a tarball.
>
> We'll probably need to spell out the preferred process in the docs,
> and reference it frequently in communications. Otherwise you'll get
> quite a few clones i
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> please look up git-bundle before suggesting things like tarballs of
> repos/checkouts.
>
Looks useful. Wasn't aware that a bundle was something other than a tarball.
We'll probably need to spell out the preferred process in the docs,
an
Mike Frysinger wrote:
exec {mj_control_fd}<>${mj_control_pipe}
I'll have to remember that feature, but unfortunately it's new in bash
4.1, so unless we're giving up 3.2 as the minimum for the tree
: $(( ++mj_num_jobs ))
Any reason not to do just
(( ++mj_num_jo
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 02 June 2012 00:11:19 Brian Harring wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> makeopts_jobs() {
>>
>> This function belongs in eutils, or somewhere similar- pretty sure
>> we've got variants of this in multiple spots. I'd pref
31 matches
Mail list logo
