On Thursday 31 May 2012 01:46:41 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 17:19:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 28 May 2012 03:58:56 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > +# @USAGE: [all]
> >
> > this is incorrect. the usage is:
> >
>
> No, it's perfectly valid. Moreover, it even explains
On Wed, 30 May 2012 17:19:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 28 May 2012 03:58:56 Michał Górny wrote:
> > +# @USAGE: [all]
>
> this is incorrect. the usage is:
>
No, it's perfectly valid. Moreover, it even explains what the function
actually does rather than your imagination.
B
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:57:43 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 May 2012 13:01:24 Michał Górny wrote:
> >> This issue was given my attention through bug 418217 [1]. Long
> >> story short -- there are applications which call pager
> >> im
On 05/30/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2012 13:01:24 Michał Górny wrote:
>> This issue was given my attention through bug 418217 [1]. Long
>> story short -- there are applications which call pager
>> implicitly. Those are git & systemd. They don't actually require
>> an
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:41:18 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed
> > > suit in our virtual/libusb:1.
> >
> > sad that we can't get these things merged. maybe we need to
> > convince dsd to hand over the reigns ?
>
>
Hi Mike, list,
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed
> > suit in our virtual/libusb:1.
>
> sad that we can't get these things merged. maybe we need to
> convince dsd to hand over the reigns ?
It seems that some don't know that dsd made me co-mai
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 13:01:24 Michał Górny wrote:
> This issue was given my attention through bug 418217 [1]. Long story
> short -- there are applications which call pager implicitly. Those are
> git & systemd. They don't actually require any pager being installed;
> however, if $PAGER is set t
On Sunday 27 May 2012 14:12:46 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in
> our virtual/libusb:1.
sad that we can't get these things merged. maybe we need to convince dsd to
hand over the reigns ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On Monday 28 May 2012 03:58:56 Michał Górny wrote:
> +# @FUNCTION: remove_libtool_files
"preen_libtool_files" might be better. after all, you aren't just removing
them all.
> +# @USAGE: [all]
this is incorrect. the usage is:
> + [[ ${#} -le 1 ]] || die "Invalid number of args to
> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> There is a number of virtuals in Gentoo which switching active
> implementation via eselect. However, most of the packages being
> 'alternative providers' don't seem to care about eselect at all. Is
> that the correct thing to do, or maybe should ev
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> No, the last mock conversion is still live and updating fairly often:
> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
Since you seem to know most about this project, can you give a short
summary on what *you* t
Am 30.05.2012 20:29, schrieb Florian Philipp:
>
> mkdir -p mkdir /tmp/foo; find "$HOME" -type f -printf '%f %s\n' | \
> gawk '{ print $2 > "/tmp/foo/" $1 }'
>
> --> Fills /tmp/foo with small files
>
> mkdir -p mkdir /tmp/foo; find "$HOME" -type f -printf '%f %s\n' | \
> mawk '{ print
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:06:45PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Of course, those previous trial runs are probably similarly dated, now,
> so a new one's probably in order with the new perspective on those bug
> priorities, etc, but at least getting the input of someone that was
> involved with them sh
Am 30.05.2012 02:11, schrieb Christoph Junghans:
> Hi,
>
> recently I stumbled across a problem with mawk, which is apprearly
> Ubuntu's default awk interpreter.
> This brought the idea to my mind of adding a virtual for awk. Beside
> the fact that we already have 3 awk interpreters in gx86 (gawk,
On 30.05.2012 18:58, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>> Hi!
>
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman
>>> wrote:
Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test
the conversi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/05/12 01:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> ... In other words, removing a pager leaves system in a broken
> state. AFAICS, 'eselect pager' doesn't even support a system
> without pager -- it just fails miserably. So the user is either
> forced to in
On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:50:19 +0100
Steven J Long wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > + find "${D}" -type f -name '*.la' -print0 | while read -r -d ''
> > f;
> ..
> > + rm -f "${f}" || die
> ..
> > + done
>
> Don't pipe to read like that; it means the final command is in a
> subshell and "di
Hello,
There is a number of virtuals in Gentoo which switching active
implementation via eselect. However, most of the packages being
'alternative providers' don't seem to care about eselect at all. Is
that the correct thing to do, or maybe should every package ensure
that after its removal anothe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman
>> wrote:
>>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test
>>> the conversion;
Hi!
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test the
> > conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.
>
> A mock conversion would probably help with creating
> proc
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 30 May 2012 07:32:49 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test the
>> conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.
>>
>>
> A mock conversion would probably h
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test the
> conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.
>
A mock conversion would probably help with creating
procedures/docs/etc as well. It is nice to say that we're "j
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Of course, there's a much larger infra component to the git migration, so
> either having that someone being an infra person, or at least having
> someone from infra have the time and be willing to work closely with
> them, is
Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 29 May 2012 21:55:04 -0400 as excerpted:
> So, what is the big issue? Is there something not being tracked, or is
> one of those items a lot harder than it looks?
I'd suggest that it's like openrc stabilization. The biggest problem
with it is that it's a BIG job, an
24 matches
Mail list logo
