On 2012-05-19 Sat 08:03, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> net-im/jabberd was masked for removal but I've fixed the bugs that it
> was masked for
> in fact, there should now be 0 bugs in bugzilla for it (or can anyone
> find some?)
> so i've unmasked it again
> was that right, wrong, what? i really don't k
On 19/05/12 13:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> EGIT_REPO_URI=(
> "git://github.com/foo/foo.git
> http://github.com/foo/foo.git";
>
> "git://github.com/foo/bar.git
> http://github.com/foo/bar.git";
> )
>
> Or something like that. What I am afraid of is that we use nested list
> w
On Sat, 19 May 2012 20:36:57 +0100
Steven J Long wrote:
> * If anyone wants to chip in with something along the lines of "you
> did but you didn't know it" or "this isn't safe" etc, please don't:
> I've heard it all before, and acknowledged technical points, and
> you'll just be adding noise and
On 05/19/2012 10:36 PM, Steven J Long wrote:
1) Random linkage into /usr/lib
..shows only /sbin/umount.udisks, an optional desktop dep, linking to /usr
here.
I know you propably meant this as an example, but I've fixed it months
ago by moving it to /usr:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/398081
Then v
On Sat, 19 May 2012 12:28:02 -0700
Luca Barbato wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17/05/12 01:40, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >
> > 1/ Mike suggested something like:
> >
> > EGIT_REPO_URI=( "repo1 fallback1" "repo2 fallback2" )
> >
> > but IMO it hurts readability
Hey, William
William Hubbs wrote:
> Steven J Long wrote:
>> Thing is it runs before the real init[1] so if we are using a separate
>> /usr partition on LVM, will it still work? I'd have thought not, since we
>> need the device-mapper service and there's /etc/lvm.conf to consider, but
>> I'll gladl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/05/12 01:40, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>
> 1/ Mike suggested something like:
>
> EGIT_REPO_URI=( "repo1 fallback1" "repo2 fallback2" )
>
> but IMO it hurts readability and makes the behavior a little surprising
> (not that the fallback syntax isn
net-im/jabberd was masked for removal but I've fixed the bugs that it
was masked for
in fact, there should now be 0 bugs in bugzilla for it (or can anyone
find some?)
so i've unmasked it again
was that right, wrong, what? i really don't know anything about the
application itself
does jabberd
# Samuli Suominen (19 May 2012)
# Dead project wrt http://bugs.gentoo.org/416613
# Use app-arch/hardlink instead
# Removal in 30 days
app-arch/hardlink++
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 14:05 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> I propose adding the following global USE flag:
>
> jit - Enable just-in-time compilation for improved performance. May
> prevent use of some PaX memory protection features in Gentoo Hardened.
>
>
> Current local flags that could p
10 matches
Mail list logo
