On Mon, 14 May 2012 07:23:35 +0200
Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 16:27 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
> > "out-of-the-box", the python team would like to add the following to
> > make.defaults in the base profile.
> >
>
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 16:27 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
> "out-of-the-box", the python team would like to add the following to
> make.defaults in the base profile.
>
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"
>
> See also bug 415575 [1].
I think thi
Ulrich Mueller posted on Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use
>> variable for users who need to pass something specific to make.
>
> You are right, of course.
> I gues
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-05-13 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-mobilephone/jacksms-desktop 2012-05-07 16:25:38 ago
app-office/languagetool 2012-05-09 07:28:15 scarabeus
dev-libs/libzip
On 05/13/2012 01:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
> "out-of-the-box", the python team would like to add the following to
> make.defaults in the base profile.
>
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"
>
> See also bug 415575 [1].
>
> Any objections?
>
To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
"out-of-the-box", the python team would like to add the following to
make.defaults in the base profile.
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"
See also bug 415575 [1].
Any objections?
I would also like to include python3_2, but I do not think this
# Pacho Ramos (13 May 2012)
# Upstream dead, needs to be ported to mp4v2-1.9.1 or gpac utils.
# Removal in a month.
media-video/undvd
# Pacho Ramos (13 May 2012)
# Overflow (#337410), no new version for a long time and nothing
# needs it. Removal in a month.
media-sound/ssrc
# Pacho Ramos (13
On Fri, 11 May 2012 16:19:33 -0700
Sébastien Fabbro wrote:
> dev-lang/icc
> dev-lang/ifc
> they have up-to-date versions in the science overlay.
Do these up-to-date ebuilds fix the Macrovision bug[1]? Do we even have
a proper workaround for the sandbox violation that doesn't involve
disabling t
In the past, some SELinux policy packages provided SELinux modules whose
name didn't reflect the package name. For instance, selinux-gnupg provided
the "gpg" SELinux module.
A year or so ago, our SELinux module packages got a standard naming
convention so that selinux- provides the SELinux module
On Sun, 13 May 2012 00:48:00 +0200
Michael Weber wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 11:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this is why we allow people to pick the appropriate step. ebuilds
> > should be using pkg_{pre,post}inst unless the user/group is needed
> > at src_* time. -mike
>
> I noticed a rather an
10 matches
Mail list logo
