[gentoo-dev] Re: New category for (libre)office extensions: app-officeext

2012-05-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Dienstag 08 Mai 2012, 12:30:04 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: >> >> After some discussion with Ulrich on IRC, we settled on the name >> "app-officeext", >> which we'll be able to fill with a couple of hundred (open|libre)office >> extensions then... :) I guess this is

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: app-officeext

2012-05-08 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Dienstag 08 Mai 2012, 12:30:04 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: > > After some discussion with Ulrich on IRC, we settled on the name > "app-officeext", > which we'll be able to fill with a couple of hundred (open|libre)office > extensions then... :) I guess this is a compromise that we all can

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 6 May 2012 18:06:35 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any > office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they > should work with anything that uses the so-called "uno bridge". uno-plugins/* jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64-fbsd profile marked 'stable'

2012-05-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 8 May 2012 15:44:09 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 8 May 2012, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > I've just marked the profile 'default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0' as > > 'stable' in profiles.desc. I've been careful not to keyword > > anything with broken deps, and its now forbidden. It is

Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64-fbsd profile marked 'stable'

2012-05-08 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 8 May 2012, Alexis Ballier wrote: > I've just marked the profile 'default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0' as 'stable' > in profiles.desc. I've been careful not to keyword anything with broken > deps, and its now forbidden. It is the first g/fbsd profile marked as > such. > [...] > cons: there'

[gentoo-dev] The fate of sparc-fbsd: not supported anymore, keywords can be dropped at will.

2012-05-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
Hi, Time has passed, nobody has been working on it in the past couple of years and I believe it is now time to make an official announce so that everyone knows: The sparc-fbsd arch is dead. People are free to drop the keywords at will. It has reached a state that it'll probably be simpler to sta

[gentoo-dev] amd64-fbsd profile marked 'stable'

2012-05-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
Hi, I've just marked the profile 'default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0' as 'stable' in profiles.desc. I've been careful not to keyword anything with broken deps, and its now forbidden. It is the first g/fbsd profile marked as such. Consequences for devs: broken deps are not allowed anymore; people are, lik

[gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: app-officeext

2012-05-08 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > > I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any > > > office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they > > > should work with anything that uses the so-called "uno bridge". > > > > > > This is why I like the new category "office-plugins" best... and >

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

2012-05-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/07/2012 11:24 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE="== ( qt webkit )" But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the firs