On 22-04-2012 21:25:40 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> BTW, how would a non-programmer (at least not C programmer) like me
> forward these ideas to the Gentoo Council?
Make sure you post pointers, with preferably a clear question, in reply
to the next call for agenda items (this Tuesday).
--
Fabi
On 04/22/2012 06:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> systemd and udev are being merged into one tarball. For the "foreseeable
> future", it will still build 2 separate binaries. What happens down the
> road if/when it all becomes one combined binary?
If becomes a problem, then it will be dealt with. T
On 04/22/2012 10:04 PM, Steven J Long wrote:
> It seems there's two major cases, with autotools or without. In either case,
> epatch_user should be called after Gentoo patches have been applied.
>
> Why not make epatch_user set a variable to indicate that patches have been
> applied, and only ap
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> Funtoo has support for FEATURES=localpatch, which does the epatch_user
>> thing before src_prepare. I think it should really go after src_prepare,
>> in order to apply patches after those that src_prepare may apply
>> (avoiding possible conflicts).
>
> I agr
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:28:08AM +0100, Steven J Long wrote
> who's going to either "port" udev as necessary, or maintain an
> old version forever?
> I will keep an old version going until the end of time.
> dberkholz: My plan is to patch reasonable behaviour back into
> udev, and going wit
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-04-22 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-plugins/vdr-games 2012-04-16 12:51:23 hd_brummy
sys-fs/bleachbit2012-04-16 20:19:52 ssuominen
www-client/galeon
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 22 April 2012 00:44:11 Steven J Long wrote:
>> I can find nothing overriding it in portage, which makes sense, since in
>> general one cannot know if the package in question uses gmake
>> .LIBPATTERNS to link to locally-built libs. However I can't help thinking
>>
On 04/22/2012 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On 04/22/2012 05:28 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
>> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> | 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes)
>>> |
>>> |See [4]: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported
>>> |configuration. If it is, newer
On 04/22/2012 05:28 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> | 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes)
>> |
>> |See [4]: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported
>> |configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and
>> |alternatives sh
On Sunday 22 April 2012 00:44:11 Steven J Long wrote:
> I can find nothing overriding it in portage, which makes sense, since in
> general one cannot know if the package in question uses gmake .LIBPATTERNS
> to link to locally-built libs. However I can't help thinking of it as
> harmful for a packa
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:39:04 -0400
Philip Webb wrote:
> 120422 Michał Górny wrote:
> > # Michał Górny (22 Apr 2012)
> > # Obsolete and unmaintained. Their functions are provided by
> > # x11-apps/xinput nowadays ('xinput set-mode' and 'xinput
> > set-pointer' # respectively). Bug #411999. Masked
120422 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> xorg-x11 is a empty 'meta package' which doesn't install anything
> you don't even need it -- most people just install xorg-server thesedays
> to avoid "dozens of unnecessary dependencies"
So it is. Thanks. I've removed both pkgs.
--
,,=
On 04/22/2012 01:39 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
120422 Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny (22 Apr 2012)
# Obsolete and unmaintained. Their functions are provided by
# x11-apps/xinput nowadays ('xinput set-mode' and 'xinput set-pointer'
# respectively). Bug #411999. Masked for removal in 30 days.
x11
120422 Michał Górny wrote:
> # Michał Górny (22 Apr 2012)
> # Obsolete and unmaintained. Their functions are provided by
> # x11-apps/xinput nowadays ('xinput set-mode' and 'xinput set-pointer'
> # respectively). Bug #411999. Masked for removal in 30 days.
> x11-apps/xsetmode
> x11-apps/xsetpointe
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> | 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes)
> |
> |See [4]: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported
> |configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and
> |alternatives should be investigated. If it isn't, a lot of
> |doc
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
>> And again, I ask: if it were *not* about running udev without an
>> initramfs, then why would anyone even be discussing the possibility of
>> patching or forking?
>>
>
> Here is my interpretation: the council voted on
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Here is my interpretation: the council voted on the following
> question:
> The question is: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a
> supported configuration."
> It did not decide the method that would be used to accomplish this.
> A
# Michał Górny (22 Apr 2012)
# Obsolete and unmaintained. Their functions are provided by
# x11-apps/xinput nowadays ('xinput set-mode' and 'xinput set-pointer'
# respectively). Bug #411999. Masked for removal in 30 days.
x11-apps/xsetmode
x11-apps/xsetpointer
<=x11-base/xorg-x11-7.4-r1
--
Best
18 matches
Mail list logo
