Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Kent Fredric
On 21 April 2012 08:33, Corentin Chary wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> On 21 April 2012 01:34, Corentin Chary wrote: >>> Yeah, not very important, but seems to work with this patch: >>> https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor/commit/972aff94744741e34e99f9173374

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 20 April 2012 16:06:02 Leho Kraav wrote: > On 20.04.2012 22:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up. > > > >> $ EPATCH_OPTS="--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources > > > > that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Leho Kraav
On 20.04.2012 22:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up. $ EPATCH_OPTS="--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be inside the ebuild. I can't see how having this available could hurt any

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Leho Kraav
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote: it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz (-f#) level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they want to kill off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so i'd like to s

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Corentin Chary
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 21 April 2012 01:34, Corentin Chary wrote: >> Yeah, not very important, but seems to work with this patch: >> https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor/commit/972aff94744741e34e99f917337430d245883c48 >> >> Example: >> $ python remoteids.py

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 20 April 2012 15:38:19 Leho Kraav wrote: > On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz > > (-f#) level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they > > want to kill off the e

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Leho Kraav
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote: > it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz (-f#) > level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they want to > kill > off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so i'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Kent Fredric
On 21 April 2012 01:34, Corentin Chary wrote: > Yeah, not very important, but seems to work with this patch: > https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor/commit/972aff94744741e34e99f917337430d245883c48 > > Example: > $ python remoteids.py --diff WWW-Bugzilla Moose bioperl > --- a/dev-perl/WWW-Bugzi

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Corentin Chary
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:39:26AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > If you really want to support Perl Modules, ( which theres not much > need for at present, looks like the team have gone through already for > the most part and added remote-id's where possible already ), anything > that inherits 'perl

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Kent Fredric
On 20 April 2012 23:21, Corentin Chary wrote: > > Currently it uses SRC_URI and HOMEPAGE, but honestly it wouldn't be > hard to use any other environment variable and to do some checks on a > webservice. > Anyway for tricky cases it can still be done by hand. > > -- > Corentin Chary > http://xf.ik

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Corentin Chary
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 20 April 2012 19:46, Corentin Chary wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: >>> On 20 April 2012 03:31, Corentin Chary wrote: Add rubygems, github, gitorious, pecl, pear, bitbucket. All of them are handl

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Kent Fredric
On 20 April 2012 19:46, Corentin Chary wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> On 20 April 2012 03:31, Corentin Chary wrote: >>> Add rubygems, github, gitorious, pecl, pear, bitbucket. >>> All of them are handled by my remoteids.py script. >>> >>> ref: https://bugs.gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Corentin Chary
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 20 April 2012 03:31, Corentin Chary wrote: >> Add rubygems, github, gitorious, pecl, pear, bitbucket. >> All of them are handled by my remoteids.py script. >> >> ref: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406287 >> ref: https://github.co

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd

2012-04-20 Thread Kent Fredric
On 20 April 2012 03:31, Corentin Chary wrote: > Add rubygems, github, gitorious, pecl, pear, bitbucket. > All of them are handled by my remoteids.py script. > > ref: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406287 > ref: https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor/blob/master/remoteids.py > > --- a/m