On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:59:11 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> OK then to enable wxwidgets in desktop profile?
Yes.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 15 April 2012 21:04:01 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would
> > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug
> > summaries (bugs without that naming
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would
> be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug
> summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by
> this, but we would still be
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-04-15 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-libs/paragui 2012-04-12 09:58:54 tupone
Additions:
dev-ruby/unf_ext2012-04-09 07:07:28 graaff
media-
Sergei Trofimovich posted on Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:25:12 +0300 as excerpted:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:53:04 +0800 Patrick Lauer
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/12 16:16, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> > Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those
>> > being patches dropped into /etc/portage/pa
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 03:55:58PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> What if some patches are applied conditionally?
imo patches that are applied conditionally should be rewritten so they
can always be applied.
patches that are applied conditionally probably won't get into upsream
most of the time.
El mié, 11-04-2012 a las 13:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 04/11/2012 09:12 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> >> OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions
> >> point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome p
W dniu 2012-04-15 18:10, Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
When package foobar gets removed from Portage, the remaining bugs
affecting foobar gets closed with resolution WONTFIX/OBSOLETE/FIXED
depending on type of the bug.
When package foobar gets readded to Portage, the maintainer needs to
check also
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 19:10 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 04/15/2012 06:47 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> > W dniu 2012-04-14 13:02, Pacho Ramos pisze:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly
> >> opened and referring to old packages no longer i
On Sunday 15 April 2012 04:16:41 Ryan Hill wrote:
> Is there any reason why this couldn't just be done in the package manager,
> making user patches available for all ebuilds without code changes?
i originally added it to eutils eclass and only called it in some ebuilds
because people were agains
On 04/15/2012 06:47 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 2012-04-14 13:02, Pacho Ramos pisze:
Hello
From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly
opened and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would
be possible to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring
in
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 17:47 +0200, Marcin Mirosław escribió:
> W dniu 2012-04-14 13:02, Pacho Ramos pisze:
> > Hello
> >
> > From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly
> > opened and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would
> > be possible to add a way to perio
W dniu 2012-04-14 13:02, Pacho Ramos pisze:
> Hello
>
> From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly
> opened and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would
> be possible to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring
> in summary to obsolete packages and, then
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:24:25 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 02:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to
> > add to metadata if you want. Thanks:
> > dev-util/ciabot-svn
> > media-sound/teamspeak-client-bin
> > media-sound/teamsp
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:12:11 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > > I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's
> > > currently provided by eutils.eclass and o
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
> > provided by eutils.eclass and only called by net-firewall/fwbuilder.
> > Shouldn't this be moved to
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
> provided by eutils.eclass and only called by net-firewall/fwbuilder.
> Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check? Current way is pretty useless
> as it's not used by most o
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:16:41 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those
> being patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are
> automatically applied. Because this feature is implemented by
> epatch_user() in eutils.eclass, it is
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:00:10 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> > Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those
> > being patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are
> > automatically applied. Because this feature is implemented by
> > epatch_user() in
>
On 2012-04-15, at 5:03 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2012 01:16 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
>>> patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are a
> Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are
> automatically applied. Because this feature is implemented by
> epatch_user() in
> eutils.eclass, it is only available for ebuilds that inherit eutils and
On 04/15/2012 12:59 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
provided by eutils.eclass and only called by net-firewall/fwbuilder.
and xfconf.eclass :)
Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check? Current way is pretty useless
as it's not u
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:00:45 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Also, the idea is to simply generate a list with possible obsolete bug
> reports, closing would still be done manually after checking for false
> positives ;)
Ah, okay. I thought you wanted something automatically closing them.
--
fonts
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 11:55 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 02:47 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> > > > > From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly opened
> > > > > and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would be possible
> > > > > to add a
Hello
I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
provided by eutils.eclass and only called by net-firewall/fwbuilder.
Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check? Current way is pretty useless
as it's not used by most of packages, and calling it from a lot of
eclasses/ebuilds
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 02:47 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> > > > From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly opened
> > > > and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would be possible
> > > > to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring in summary to
> > > >
Thanks everyone for your extremely useful tips. I seem to have it
working now. The problem is that ZFS does memory allocations when asked
to write things.
A makeshift solution is to do `echo 524288 >
/proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes`. A more permanent fix will take more time
to produce, but at least I
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:53:04 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 04/15/12 16:16, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> > patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
> > applied. Because this feature is implem
On 04/15/2012 02:03 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> The reason that Funtoo's FEATURES=localpatch applies patches before
>> src_prepare is that it's common for eautoreconf to be called inside
>> src_prepare, and applying patches after src_prepare can create a need to
>> call eautoreconf a second time.
>
>
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:53:04 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 04/15/12 16:16, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> > patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
> > applied. Because this feature is implem
Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
applied. Because this feature is implemented by epatch_user() in
eutils.eclass, it is only available for ebuilds that inherit eutils and
explicitly
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/15/2012 01:16 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> > patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
> > applied. Because this feature is impl
On 04/15/12 16:16, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
> applied. Because this feature is implemented by epatch_user() in
> eutils.eclass, it is only available fo
> > > From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly opened
> > > and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would be possible
> > > to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring in summary to
> > > obsolete packages and, then, allow us to have a cleaner bug list?
On 04/15/2012 01:16 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
> applied. Because this feature is implemented by epatch_user() in
> eutils.eclass, it is only availab
35 matches
Mail list logo
