[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due bass retirement

2012-03-18 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:25:58 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: > app-doc/ebookmerge This is something bass wrote that grabs html manuals from http://htmlhelp.berlios.de (which doesn't exist anymore - it moved to http://code.google.com/p/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-video/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-0.10.2.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-03-18 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/19/2012 07:39 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:54:03 + (UTC) "Alexis Ballier (aballier)" wrote: aballier12/03/18 13:54:03 Modified: ChangeLog Added:ffmpeg-0.10.2.ebuild Log: version bump (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha91/cvs/L

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-video/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-0.10.2.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-03-18 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:54:03 + (UTC) "Alexis Ballier (aballier)" wrote: > aballier12/03/18 13:54:03 > > Modified: ChangeLog > Added:ffmpeg-0.10.2.ebuild > Log: > version bump > > (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha91/cvs/Linux x86_64) > FFTOOLS="avioc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!

2012-03-18 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:12:11AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > TOOT!!! (blowing my own horn). See http://www.waltdnes.org/mdev/ for > instructions on replacing udev with mdev for simple Gentoo systems. > Hopefully more info will start arriving, allowing more complex systems > to work with mdev.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo CJK team empty, or anyone knows about ibus?

2012-03-18 Thread Naohiro Aota
Ben writes: > On 19 March 2012 01:09, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> >> Will CC cjk team then to let them know you are interested to join (looks >> like there are four devs in cjk alias...) > > But none of them seem active... hmm, Matuu and I'm working on some bugs one-by-one... Are there any bugs you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo CJK team empty, or anyone knows about ibus?

2012-03-18 Thread Naohiro Aota
Hi, It is great to hear Jack is willing to join cjk herd. I can help Jack working on cjk bugs. But, to be honest, I'm not familiar with recruiting process so I need some devs to do or to help me on the recruiting. Also I've read the "Mentor Guide" [1] and found "your project lead must be CC'd". I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-18 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:36:34PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 19 March 2012 14:12, Steven J Long wrote: > > > > As for non-bash ebuilds, I have always agreed with antarus that they should > > simply use a different extension. Adding a new extension per source language > > is a *lot* cleaner t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo CJK team empty, or anyone knows about ibus?

2012-03-18 Thread Ben
On 19 March 2012 01:09, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Will CC cjk team then to let them know you are interested to join (looks > like there are four devs in cjk alias...) But none of them seem active...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-18 Thread Kent Fredric
On 19 March 2012 14:12, Steven J Long wrote: > > As for non-bash ebuilds, I have always agreed with antarus that they should > simply use a different extension. Adding a new extension per source language > is a *lot* cleaner than one per EAPI. Ok: If we take this notion and enshrine it in stone:

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-18 Thread Steven J Long
Firstly, wrt probing the ebuild for EAPI=.. I'd just like to point out that a regex is not required during the scan, and nor is restricting it to the first N lines, though the latter may be desirable and could trivially exclude comment and whitespace-only or empty lines. Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-03-18 23h59 UTC

2012-03-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2012-03-18 23h59 UTC. Removals: gnustep-libs/objcunit 2012-03-14 23:26:20 voyageur gnustep-apps/cynthiune 2012-03-14 23:27:43 voyageur gnustep-apps/g

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-cpp/cppserv and dev-cpp/sptk

2012-03-18 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (18 Mar 2012) # The only working versions got declared obsolete by upstream # See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9 # Removal in 30 days dev-cpp/cppserv dev-cpp/sptk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Change USE flags when compiling with FEATURES=test

2012-03-18 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/18/2012 12:18 AM, Duncan wrote: > What's you're definition of "sane"? Does it include the > /etc/portage/package.env and/or /etc/portage/env/cat-egory/pkg files > configuration options? > > I've been using (and prefer) the latter for quite some time for various > per-package settings (tho

[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
With bass retirement (#391429) lcd has become empty, is anybody willing to join or should their packages be moved to maintainer-needed (CCing that empty herd to allow somebody joining in the future to easily resurrect the herd)? Thanks signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messa

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due bass retirement

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: app-admin/localepurge app-admin/recursos app-doc/ebookmerge app-misc/gnomecatalog dev-embedded/gnap-dev dev-embedded/gnap net-analyzer/midas-nms net-im/coccinella net-misc/htbinit net-nds/lat Thanks for taking them signatur

[gentoo-dev] lcd herd is empty

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
With jokey retirement (#118003) lcd has become empty, is anybody willing to join or should their packages be moved to maintainer-needed (CCing that empty herd to allow somebody joining in the future to easily resurrect the herd)? Thanks signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messa

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due jokey retirement

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: app-misc/ytree app-portage/maintainer-helper app-shells/pdmenu dev-libs/libmba dev-vcs/easygit net-misc/italc net-misc/proxytunnel net-misc/x-lite (has a proxy maintainer!) sys-fs/archfs Thanks for taking them signature.asc De

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due iluxa retirement

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-cpp/cppserv Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last-rite for dev-php/PEAR-DB_DataObject_FormBuilder

2012-03-18 Thread Matti Bickel
# Matti Bickel (18 Mar 2012) # masked for removal in 30 days, ~15 Apr 2012 # unmaintained upstream (bug #396963) dev-php/PEAR-DB_DataObject_FormBuilder

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo CJK team empty, or anyone knows about ibus?

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 05-03-2012 a las 07:12 -0800, Jack Morgan escribió: > I'd like to help with this and will take a look at the bug below. I'd > like to be part of the cjk herd as well. > > On 03/05/12 05:56, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > Really need a reply on http://bugs.gentoo.org/405777 and nobody seems to

Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 15:11 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió: > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 14:31, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and > > media-optical. > > We just cleaned out most of the net-zope packages. The remaining > net-zope packages will b

Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical, net-zope, sgml, text-markup herds are empty

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:21 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 22:02 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: > > > On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny e

Re: Anybody willing to take care of sgml herd? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical, net-zope, sgml, text-markup herds are empty)

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 13:38 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Is anyone willing to join the herd? If not, maybe somebody could take a > > few packages if they want to take care of only a set of them and not all > > the beast :-/ > > I took

Re: Anybody willing to take care of sgml herd? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical, net-zope, sgml, text-markup herds are empty)

2012-03-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Is anyone willing to join the herd? If not, maybe somebody could take a > few packages if they want to take care of only a set of them and not all > the beast :-/ I took a look at the sgml bugs list, and most of them seem pretty straightforwar

Anybody willing to take care of sgml herd? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical, net-zope, sgml, text-markup herds are empty)

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 18:01 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:21 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 22:02 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: > > > > On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-libs/libtomcrypt, app-admin/srlog2, dev-libs/tomsfastmath, gnome-extra/hardware-monitor, dev-dotnet/gluezilla

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (18 Mar 2012) # Broken in several ways, removal in 30 days. # Bug 262601 dev-libs/libtomcrypt app-admin/srlog2 dev-libs/tomsfastmath # Pacho Ramos (18 Mar 2012) # Upstream dead, nobody willing to maintain it and # buggy, bug #348500. Removal in 30 days. gnome-extra/hardware-monitor

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > If we want to keep .ebuild but avoid the compat issue another > variant would be "EAPI in header comment and one-time change of > ebuild location" or more formal: > 6 EAPI in header comment and one-time change of ebuild location: > - add a dir

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-18 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > The ebuild extensions for GLEP 55 > would likely always be ebuild- as integers are reserved for > future use by Gentoo. Looking at GLEP 55 the proposal was ebuild- - not ebuild-. I don't believe there is any restriction that EAPIs be int

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1?

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 13-03-2012 a las 11:52 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > On 03/11/2012 05:49 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > > If people want to enforce the eapi1 is no longer used in the gentoo > > repo, that's fine- we stick a list of acceptable EAPI's into > > its layout.conf. > > That sounds pretty reasonabl

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-18 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:41:02 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Hi all, > > The way how we currently specify the EAPI in ebuilds has some > problems. For example, there is no sane way to allow usage of features > of a new bash version in a new EAPI. So we are currently stuck with > bash 3.2. Also chan

[gentoo-dev] Re: Change USE flags when compiling with FEATURES=test

2012-03-18 Thread Duncan
Kent Fredric posted on Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:43:55 +1300 as excerpted: > I think what would be more practical is a sane way to enable FEATURES="" > on a per-package level like USE flags in portage, then you could enable > FEATURES="test" for that one package and it would always build that > package