On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 21:24 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 29/02/12 20:51, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > The proposed eclass omits three features from python.eclass which are
> > heavily used in the gnome stack.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but Gnome doesn't use standard distutils?
Gnome i
On 29/02/12 22:08, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 29 Februar 2012, 21:24:49 schrieb Krzysztof Pawlik:
>>> Second, there doesn't seem to be any support for packages that do not
>>> install in python's site-packages and do not allow multiple python ABIs.
>>> If I have, for example, a package
Am Mittwoch 29 Februar 2012, 21:24:49 schrieb Krzysztof Pawlik:
> > Second, there doesn't seem to be any support for packages that do not
> > install in python's site-packages and do not allow multiple python ABIs.
> > If I have, for example, a package that installs python modules
> > in /usr/lib/a
On 29/02/12 20:51, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 22:13 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After some work during weekend on Python packages I've decided to start a
>> rewrite of Python/distutils eclass for installing Python packages. My main
>> goal
>> was simplic
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 22:13 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After some work during weekend on Python packages I've decided to start a
> rewrite of Python/distutils eclass for installing Python packages. My main
> goal
> was simplicity and functionality similar to ruby-ng.eclass (thank
El mié, 29-02-2012 a las 09:51 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió:
> Tomorrow, March 1, is the deadline for removing almost all of the
> Zope/Plone packages from the portage tree (those who still want them
> can get them from Arfrever's Progress overlay).
>
> Since only one or two packages would rema
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 29/02/12 09:11, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>>> If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
>>> this
>>> to portage (after finishing remaining TODO i
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:38:22 +0100
Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 29/02/12 08:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > This is awesome! Compare that to over 3000 LOC of python.eclass. :)
>
> Count distutils.eclass too:
>
> $ wc -l python-distutils-ng.eclass python.eclass distutils.eclass
>364 pytho
On 29/02/12 09:11, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
>> this
>> to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of
>> RAM(!!)).
>
> Can we perhaps just
On 29/02/12 08:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 2/28/12 10:13 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> Highlights:
>> - <400 lines of code including documentation
>> - should work for >95% of packages (my educated guess)
>> - did I mention it's *SIMPLE*?
>> - easy to maintain & read so it's also easy
On 29/02/12 06:13, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After some work during weekend on Python packages I've decided to start a
>> rewrite of Python/distutils eclass for installing Python packages. My main
>> goal
>> was simplicity and f
On 29/02/12 04:21, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:13:36 +0100
> Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>
>> I'm attaching the eclass itself and two ebuilds using it, code is also
>> available
>> in my overlay at
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/nelchael.git;a=summary
> Nice!
On 29/02/12 09:17, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-02-2012 22:13:36 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> [good stuff]
>
> Much appreciated!
>
> From 2nd example ebuild:
>> python_install_all() {
>> rm -f "${D}/usr/bin"/*.py || die
>
> s/D/ED/ here for Prefix :)
>
> I haven't checked the eclass i
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:45 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 2/27/12 10:37 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> >> I think somebody pointed some "revdep-rebuild" versions where exiting
> >> with successful code even when failed, was fixed version stabilized?
> >
> > No, it is only in - so far. It
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 2/20/12 6:03 PM, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> Since I plan to use the remote remote-id tag for euscan, and I already
>> use SRC_URI but I'd like all ebuild to use mirrors, I've wrote to
>> scripts to cleanup your ebuilds and metadata.
>>
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:19AM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (29 Feb 2012)
> # The old version of gnunet in portage is broken with the
> # new libextractor API.
> # Bugs 338909, #403461, #367677 and #260113.
> # Removal in 30 days unless fixed.
> net-p2p/gnunet
> net-p2p/gn
Tomorrow, March 1, is the deadline for removing almost all of the
Zope/Plone packages from the portage tree (those who still want them
can get them from Arfrever's Progress overlay).
Since only one or two packages would remain in the category, do we
want the category to stay around, or should it b
On 2/27/12 10:37 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> I think somebody pointed some "revdep-rebuild" versions where exiting
>> with successful code even when failed, was fixed version stabilized?
>
> No, it is only in - so far. It has not been released in a -0.3*
> ebuild yet.
>
> The last patch to re
On 28-02-2012 22:13:36 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
[good stuff]
Much appreciated!
From 2nd example ebuild:
> python_install_all() {
> rm -f "${D}/usr/bin"/*.py || die
s/D/ED/ here for Prefix :)
I haven't checked the eclass in detail, but did you intend to make it
Prefix aware at all?
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
> this
> to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of
> RAM(!!)).
Can we perhaps just name it python-r2 rather than python-distutils-ng?
S
20 matches
Mail list logo
