On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:37:39 -0500
Richard Yao wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> I took a look at the problem cited in your bug report. I suggest
> compiling sys-boot/grub with CFLAGS="-O0 -ggdb3", attaching gdb to
> grub-install and then watching what happens in the debugger. If you
> compare runs with a GCC
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:30 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> >> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a ne
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:30:40 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:03 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes
> > people's systems unbootable.
> >
> > I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions.
> gcc is slot
> I took a look at the problem cited in your bug report. I suggest
> compiling sys-boot/grub with CFLAGS="-O0 -ggdb3", attaching gdb to
> grub-install and then watching what happens in the debugger. If you
> compare runs with a GCC 4.5.3 built stage2 and a GCC 4.6.2 built
> stage2, you should be ab
Ryan,
I took a look at the problem cited in your bug report. I suggest
compiling sys-boot/grub with CFLAGS="-O0 -ggdb3", attaching gdb to
grub-install and then watching what happens in the debugger. If you
compare runs with a GCC 4.5.3 built stage2 and a GCC 4.6.2 built
stage2, you should be able
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:03 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> > stabilization)?
> >
> > I have read hardmask m
On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
>> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
>> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
>> stabilization)?
>>
>> I have read hardmask message but it sim
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
>> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
>> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
>> stabilization)?
>>
>> I have read hardmask message b
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> stabilization)?
>
> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for
> testing purpose
>
> Bleh, looks like grub is blocking this :(, will need to wait then (or
> maybe move to grub2 ;))
Yeah... anyone helping to debug this tricky thingy [*] is likely welcome.
Would like to help, but cant do much atm because of real-life work load...
[*] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:00:31 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
>> Yes, please. Once these get fixed then we can drop localepurge.
>
> That's a lot of bugs to fix, and the way LINGUAS now works, we could
> at least do with a QA check that helps fi
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use
>> "MAKEOPTS +=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild)
>> instead or it should be avoided for some reason.
> += wasn't allowed because it isn't compatible with bash-3.1 (a
We had a chat about this in #gentoo-dev the other night. I might come
up with a solution as part of the ZFS stuff that I am doing, but it
won't happen for at least a month.
With that said, it doesn't look like GRUB is the only blocker:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=gcc-4.6
On Mon, Feb
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:00:31 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Yes, please. Once these get fixed then we can drop localepurge.
That's a lot of bugs to fix, and the way LINGUAS now works, we could
at least do with a QA check that helps figure out which packages break
when new translations are added to ne
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 21:41 +0100, Justin escribió:
> On 20.02.2012 21:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> > stabilization)?
> >
> > I have read hardmask message but it sim
On 20.02.2012 21:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> stabilization)?
>
> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for
> testing purposes :-/
>
> Thank
I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
stabilization)?
I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for
testing purposes :-/
Thanks a lot for the info
signature.asc
Description: This i
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> The problem is that users CCed on their bug reports have provided
> patches and fixes for them and would probably get angry if we punt them
> without even applying the patches to the tree (but I don't want to
> commit them as I cannot even test
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:58:06 +0100
Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> localepurge will be removed from portage [1]. As I was (/am) heavy
> user of it I found it funny that "linguas takes care of the proper
> locale installation" [2]. Maybe it should, but there's some major
> failure in lots of packages.
I
On 02/20/2012 09:36 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 17:57 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus12/02/20 15:57:31
Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Use single thread build
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 13:09 -0500, Michael Sterrett escribió:
> Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib? There are only 46 ebuilds that
> use it (some, optionally).
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> > htt
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 17:57 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> > scarabeus12/02/20 15:57:31
> >
> >Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
> >Log:
> >Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on
Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib? There are only 46 ebuilds that
use it (some, optionally).
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
> 2Fsvgalib;list_id=8127
Hi,
Since I plan to use the remote remote-id tag for euscan, and I already
use SRC_URI but I'd like all ebuild to use mirrors, I've wrote to
scripts to cleanup your ebuilds and metadata.
There are available here: https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor
Here is what you can do with them:
python r
On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus12/02/20 15:57:31
Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on some machines wrt
bug#405029.
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha87/cvs/Linux x86_6
On 20/02/2012 07:47, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 20-02-2012 03:07:33 +, Kerin Millar wrote:
I know that adding LANG=POSIX doesn't do anything in this case but I
have a feeling that its presence would be instructive to new users. If a
user is asked to configure something which isn't present, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson schrieb:
>> P.S. would be nice to have a wd_WD.UTF-8 with WD standing for
>> world, just a country is so 1900
>>
>
> wd_WD.UTF-8 is certainly a no go. WD doesn't match any ISO country
> code. To support it, we'd have to create t
27 matches
Mail list logo
