-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/02/12 08:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani
> wrote:
>
>> I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but
>> maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly
>> packag
# Ole Markus With (11 Feb 2012)
# Made obsolete by PHP 5.3. Bugs #402862, #402865.
# Masked for removal on 11 Mar 2012
dev-php/pecl-idn
dev-php/pecl-enchant
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> > Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in
> > sync with 'features/64bit-native' one: [1]. Exception is
> > 'hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib' profile. Looks like a bug.
>
> Synced this bit with a fix:
>
> | 11 Feb 2012; Sergei Trofimovich
> | hardened/linux/amd64/no-
[ CCed gentoo-harde...@lists.gentoo.org
to warn against possible breakage. Touching
profiles make me nervous.
TS:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_7c41ab6653426048c2e8b0f271637bf3.xml ]
> Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in
> sync with 'features/64bit-n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> AFAIK features/64bit-native is for other 64-bit arches too like ia64
> and ppc64. So we can't really drop this. And we can't drop the
> per-arch 64bit file because if a package does not work on ia64 it does
> not mean that it doesn't work on amd64 no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/11/2012 02:38 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-of-sync data:
>
> profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib/package.mask
> profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask
>
> They both essentially block x8
We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-of-sync data:
profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib/package.mask
profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask
They both essentially block x86-only stuff.
AFAIU profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask
should contain bits, which are port
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100
> Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>
>> I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe
>> I'm wrong.
>> Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application
>> name) to packag
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100
Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe
> I'm wrong.
> Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application
> name) to packages.
> Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to "LibreOffice Writer"
I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe
I'm wrong.
Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application
name) to packages.
Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to "LibreOffice Writer" in package metadata.
How about expanding metadata.xml (adding to its
10 matches
Mail list logo
