On Friday 20 January 2012 07:49:07 Rich Freeman wrote:
> Perhaps this is worth its own thread, as this one is already drifting
> way off topic.
i don't mind thread drift too much as it often times results in good things in
related areas. in this case, i think we've had good fallout.
-mike
sign
On 01/20/2012 01:12 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> On 20 January 2012 12:31, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 01/20/2012 10:28 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>>> I'd like to chime in here. I started a thread on gentoo-user (Portage
>>> option "--changed-use" not working?) pretty much about this.
>>>
>>> I use --ch
On 20 January 2012 12:31, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 10:28 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>> I'd like to chime in here. I started a thread on gentoo-user (Portage
>> option "--changed-use" not working?) pretty much about this.
>>
>> I use --changed-use instead of --newuse to get the advantages o
On 01/20/2012 10:28 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> I'd like to chime in here. I started a thread on gentoo-user (Portage
> option "--changed-use" not working?) pretty much about this.
>
> I use --changed-use instead of --newuse to get the advantages of a
> fully up-to-date system without the unnecess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
You all know that boost builds certain python bindings. Right now, boost
installs only one version of each boost python library, however
packages linking to these libraries may compile against a different
python version than the one used to
On 19 January 2012 09:22, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 05:56 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Duncan<1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:00:52 -0500 as excerpted:
>>>
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 21:42:14 Micha
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:00:52 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> On Wednesday 18 January 2012 21:42:14 Michael Weber wrote:
>>> Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds?
>>
>> take a chi
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:49:07 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Zac Medico posted on Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:39:12 -0800 as excerpted:
> >
> >> Maybe it would be enough to add a suggestion about --exclude in the
> >> --newuse section
Rich Freeman posted on Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:49:07 -0500 as excerpted:
> I'd still like to see our handbook include a recommended workflow for
> keeping gentoo up-to-date. Perhaps that should include a few options
> with the pros/cons of each.
Agreed.
> I'd think that emerge -auDNv world would be
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Zac Medico posted on Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:39:12 -0800 as excerpted:
>
>> Maybe it would be enough to add a suggestion about --exclude in the
>> --newuse section of the emerge man page? I don't think this is confusing
>> enough
10 matches
Mail list logo
