On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:40:01 -0600
Dale wrote:
> >> I keep hoping that all the smart people involved in this will see
> >> the mess it is creating. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but
> >> I'm sharp enough to see the mess this is going to create and I'm
> >> just a desktop user. I feel sor
Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10.01.2012 19:56, Dale wrote:
Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 Enrico
Weigelt wrote:
* Micha?? Górny schrieb:
Does working hard involve compiling even more packages
statically?
I guess
Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Dale wrote:
Took me days to get dracut to work. Where does 15 minutes come from? How
much time does it take when the initramfs fails?
I've used dracut on a few VMs now and on my main Gentoo box. My
experience has been that it didn't take
Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:56:11 -0600
Dale wrote:
Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Micha?? Górny schrieb:
Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically?
I guess, he means keeping udev in / ?
Because a
On 10:25 Fri 06 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:29:53 -0500
> Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > I would suggest not removing the symlink unless there is a technical
> > reason why its presence is undesirable.
>
> The symlink is distro-specific. Honestly, I'd get rid of it so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10.01.2012 19:56, Dale wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 Enrico
>> Weigelt wrote:
>>
>>> * Micha?? Górny schrieb:
>>>
Does working hard involve compiling even more packages
statically?
>>> I guess, he m
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Dale wrote:
> Took me days to get dracut to work. Where does 15 minutes come from? How
> much time does it take when the initramfs fails?
I've used dracut on a few VMs now and on my main Gentoo box. My
experience has been that it didn't take long to figure out,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:03:15 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> The mess was created by people shouting 'hey, real men use
> separate /usr for no good reason! Be awesome like us'.
You appear to be confusing "I don't understand this" with "no-one
understands this".
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
De
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:56:11 -0600
Dale wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100
> > Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >
> >> * Micha?? Górny schrieb:
> >>
> >>> Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically?
> >> I guess, he means keeping udev in / ?
> > Be
Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Micha?? Górny schrieb:
Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically?
I guess, he means keeping udev in / ?
Because adding 80 KiB of initramfs hurts so much? We should then put
more work jus
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Micha?? Górny schrieb:
>
> > Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically?
>
> I guess, he means keeping udev in / ?
Because adding 80 KiB of initramfs hurts so much? We should then put
more work just to ensure
* Micha?? Górny schrieb:
> Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically?
I guess, he means keeping udev in / ?
cu
--
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931
El mar, 10-01-2012 a las 12:39 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 01/09/2012 10:04 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> > 2012/1/9 Samuli Suominen:
> >> # Samuli Suominen (09 Jan 2012)
> >> # Fails to compile against recent glibc and multiple other issues.
> >> # No maintainer to take care of the packa
On 01/09/2012 10:04 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
2012/1/9 Samuli Suominen:
# Samuli Suominen (09 Jan 2012)
# Fails to compile against recent glibc and multiple other issues.
# No maintainer to take care of the package. Removal in 30 days.
# Bugs 325331, 284369, 380749, 388741, 381539, 358697, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
