# Samuli Suominen (23 Dec 2011)
# Missing fltk-1.3 support and forced downgrade of fltk
# in the same stabilization level which makes this gentoo-x86
# incompatible package. Bug 395747. Removal in 30 days.
media-radio/fldigi
i'll add USE=neon to use.desc and punt the local descriptions if nobody
objects
media-libs/libpng: support ARM NEON cpu instruction set
media-libs/vo-aacenc: Enable neon cpu instructions
media-video/ffmpeg: Enables NEON optimizations for arm processors.
media-video/libav: Enable NEON optimizatio
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:09:16 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
>>> Just wanted to point out that (if there is enough memory) recent
>>> kernels manage much better parallelism, even excess of it, once
>>> reached the maximum load augm
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Just wanted to point out that (if there is enough memory) recent
>> kernels manage much better parallelism, even excess of it, once
>> reached the maximum load augmenting threads only bring minimal loss of
>> "real" time.
>
> Does that inclu
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:11:32 +0100
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> > I tried messing around with this with Amazon EC2. The problem was
> > that due to latency I only really saw the benefit for VERY high
> > levels of parallelization (think -j25+).. However, make isn't
> > actually "distcc-aware" so it
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:42:22 + (UTC)
"Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus)" wrote:
> Index: ffmpeg-0.9.ebuild
[...]
> KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc
> ~x86 ~x86-fbsd"
please be more careful with keywords, this would force people to switch
to libav on arches where ffmp
2011/12/22 Rich Freeman :
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Donnie Berkholz
> wrote:
>> I looked into this 6 or 7 years ago. It wasn't feasible unless you were
>> on an extremely high-speed, low-latency network, beyond what was
>> typically accessible at the time outside of universities and LAN
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I looked into this 6 or 7 years ago. It wasn't feasible unless you were
> on an extremely high-speed, low-latency network, beyond what was
> typically accessible at the time outside of universities and LANs. Could
> be worth exploring agai
