On 12/17/2011 05:22 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I didn't cc
arches like ppc.
One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit many bugs at once"
Bugzilla feature, and when filing bugs the script checks that it's
repoman-possible to
On 12/17/2011 04:02 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:47:47 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 12/17/2011 08:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:33:11 + Markos Chandras
>>> wrote:
to avoid useless compilations to slow machines
>>>
>>> That's a pac
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:38:31 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 17-12-2011 a las 16:22 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió:
> > For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I
> > didn't cc arches like ppc.
And correctly so.
> > One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit ma
El sáb, 17-12-2011 a las 16:22 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió:
> For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I didn't cc
> arches like ppc.
>
> One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit many bugs at once"
> Bugzilla feature, and when filing bugs the script checks that
On 12/16/11 3:12 PM, justin wrote:
> So lets agree that your proceeding is worth the effort, but extend the
> time you give the maintainer to iron their packages.
Sounds good, looks like other people have similar comments about this.
I'll do that, thank you for feedback. :)
signature.asc
Descri
For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I didn't cc
arches like ppc.
One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit many bugs at once"
Bugzilla feature, and when filing bugs the script checks that it's
repoman-possible to stabilize given package on x86 and amd64.
Not all pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:47:47 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 12/17/2011 08:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:33:11 + Markos Chandras
> > wrote:
> >> to avoid useless compilations to slow machines
> >
> > That's a package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/17/2011 08:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:33:11 + Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> to avoid useless compilations to slow machines
>
> That's a package manager issue, not an ebuild issue.
>
How come? The package appears
El sáb, 17-12-2011 a las 09:56 +, Markos Chandras escribió:
[...]
> I guess I belong to the minority of
> people who do own a single core PC in 2011 :)
>
> - --
> Regards,
> Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
I still maintain a Pentium 4 HT and an Athlon 3200+ ;)
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/17/2011 09:34 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> 2011/12/16 Markos Chandras :
>> On 12/12/2011 05:44 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
>>> scarabeus11/12/12 17:44:48
>>>
>>> Modified: ChangeLog Added:
>>> libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:33:11 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> to avoid useless compilations to slow machines
That's a package manager issue, not an ebuild issue.
- --
Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
i
11 matches
Mail list logo
