Importing base.eclass causes us to export src_unpack() phase function
which is entirely useless in EAPIs 2+ (which we only support), and
causes trouble importing autotools-utils e.g. after VCS eclasses.
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392651
---
eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 54
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:23:53 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> - base_src_configure "${econfargs[@]}" "$@"
> + default_src_configure "${econfargs[@]}" "$@"
Ohshi, default funcs don't take args...
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Importing base.eclass causes us to export src_unpack() phase function
which is entirely useless in EAPIs 2+ (which we only support), and
causes trouble importing autotools-utils e.g. after VCS eclasses.
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392651
---
eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 54
On Sunday 27 November 2011 17:28:12 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2011-11-26 11:58:22 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
> > On 26-11-2011 01:54:35 +, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > > commit: 1d4ac47c28706094230cb2c4e6ee1c1c71629aa0
> > > T> Org>
> > > AuthorDate: Sat
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 13:23:53 Michał Górny wrote:
> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: DOCS
> +# @DESCRIPTION:
> +# Array containing documents passed to dodoc command.
> +#
> +# DOCS=( NEWS README )
> +
> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: HTML_DOCS
> +# @DESCRIPTION:
> +# Array containing documents passed to dohtml
All,
when you assign bugs to openrc, can you please make sure that the
product and component settings are correct? They should be:
product: "Gentoo Hosted Projects"
Component: openrc
Thanks,
William
pgphqi8jhEKVw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Importing base.eclass causes us to export src_unpack() phase function
which is entirely useless in EAPIs 2+ (which we only support), and
causes trouble importing autotools-utils e.g. after VCS eclasses.
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392651
---
eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 38
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:34:05 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 08:09 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 01:23:59 Zac Medico wrote:
> >> If it wasn't for implicit system dependencies, the system set and its
> >> dependencies wouldn't need this kind of special treat
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> Ignoring circular dependencies doesn't make them go away. Ignoring
> dependencies can lead to build failures that could have been avoided if
> they were expressed in a way that the dependency resolver could properly
> account for them.
++
One
On 11/30/2011 08:09 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 01:23:59 Zac Medico wrote:
>> If it wasn't for implicit system dependencies, the system set and its
>> dependencies wouldn't need this kind of special treatment.
>
> if it wasn't for implicit system dependencies, we'd ha
# Samuli Suominen (30 Nov 2011)
# Everything is (or should be) using slotted vala by now
# Remove the old unslotted copy in 30 days
(28 Nov 2011)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Still requiring gnome-panel 2.x
# with bonobo, as well as old SLOT of libindicator
# The effort to get ayatana libs in
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 01:23:59 Zac Medico wrote:
> If it wasn't for implicit system dependencies, the system set and its
> dependencies wouldn't need this kind of special treatment.
if it wasn't for implicit system dependencies, we'd have significant bloat in
the tree and circular deps ou
12 matches
Mail list logo
