[gentoo-dev] Re: have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-15 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:11:23 -0800 as excerpted: > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/faq.xml#doc_chap1_sect9 Thanks for that link. Somehow, I don't have the portage FAQ in my bookmarks, where I could refer to it answering questions, etc (as well as for my own use)

[gentoo-dev] Re: OpenCV 2.3.1a, and earlier CUDA vs GCC 4.4

2011-11-15 Thread Duncan
Radosław Smogura posted on Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:05:53 +0100 as excerpted: > In OpenCV 2.3.1a and 2.3.0 there is test for GCC 4.5, it looks like this > test is wrong, it should be > > if [ "$(gcc-version)" >= "4.5" ]; then > > but is if [ "$(gcc-version)" > "4.4" ]; then > > In particulary this r

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-15 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/15/2011 04:27 AM, Alex Alexander wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:19:35AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 11/14/2011 12:25 AM, Alex Alexander wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:59:21PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: Well, it's much easier to gather interest and get feedback if we deploy >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-15 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/14/2011 03:17 PM, Duncan wrote: > Zac Medico posted on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:22:19 -0800 as excerpted: > >> On 11/14/2011 12:47 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:59, Zac Medico wrote: Well, it's much easier to gather interest and get feedback if we deploy the

[gentoo-dev] OpenCV 2.3.1a, and earlier CUDA vs GCC 4.4

2011-11-15 Thread Radosław Smogura
Hello, In OpenCV 2.3.1a and 2.3.0 there is test for GCC 4.5, it looks like this test is wrong, it should be if [ "$(gcc-version)" >= "4.5" ]; then but is if [ "$(gcc-version)" > "4.4" ]; then In particulary this removes support for CUDA when GCC 4.4.5 is used. I think CUDA should be removed

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog in eclass dir

2011-11-15 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/15/2011 11:15 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:25:32 +0100 > "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > >> 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory? In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical reasons... Should we still start one? >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog in eclass dir (was: Old changelogs / eclass dir)

2011-11-15 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:25:32 +0100 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > > > > 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory? > > > In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for > > > historical reasons... Should we still start one? > > > > as there was only positive feedback to this

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-15 Thread Alex Alexander
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:22:19AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/14/2011 12:47 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:59, Zac Medico wrote: > >> Well, it's much easier to gather interest and get feedback if we deploy > >> the change and ask questions later. > > > > I like th

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-15 Thread Alex Alexander
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:19:35AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/14/2011 12:25 AM, Alex Alexander wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:59:21PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > >> Well, it's much easier to gather interest and get feedback if we deploy > >> the change and ask questions later. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-15 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le samedi 12 novembre 2011 à 21:49 -0200, Rafael Goncalves Martins a écrit : > Then why not you and the other 2 guys that approved this change here > (and are the only people I saw approving this, TBH), add > --quiet-build=y to your default emerge opts and avoid this kind of > change? > > Regards,