[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 21:00:32 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > I've seen too many bugs reports today that gave me cute, colorful > > build.logs and almost no information about underlaying bug... > > That's usually because users sometimes attach only "relevant" parts of build > log (well, relevan

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-info.eclass: check_extra_config requires a configured kernel

2011-11-05 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:16:13PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > - Does the package _build_ kernel modules? > Yes: .config is required. > No: .config is NOT required. All options must have '~' prefix. > - Does the package use the options specified _during_ src_configure, > src_compile, sr

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Kacper Kowalik
On 11/05/11 21:00, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Saturday 05 of November 2011 09:58:00 Kacper Kowalik wrote: >> Hi, >> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have >> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a >> lot of packages that support things

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Saturday 05 of November 2011 09:58:00 Kacper Kowalik wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a > lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" > too. > > I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Kacper Kowalik
W dniu 05.11.2011 18:04, Michał Górny pisze: > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 12:05:15 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Kacper Kowalik wrote: >> >>> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have >>> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 12:05:15 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Kacper Kowalik wrote: > > > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but > > there's a lot of packages that support things

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 05-11-2011 a las 09:58 +0100, Kacper Kowalik escribió: > Hi, > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a > lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too. > > I'v

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rotating oversized ChangeLog files

2011-11-05 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > Sounds good. So, we have a spec... and the portage team has two months to > get it into "emerge --changelog". :) > For whoever is interested, I've just filed a portage feature request in bug 389611. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389611 Please support "rotated ChangeLog files" in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Kacper Kowalik wrote: > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but > there's a lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or > "make VERBOSE=1" too. > I've seen too many bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > Is there a way to output the verbose log to build.log, but show the > shortened log to the terminal? The non-verbose build is quite useful > for seeing the actual warnings as they fly by rather than the entire > gcc/libtool command, whic

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a > lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too. > > I've seen to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 05-11-2011 09:58:00 +0100, Kacper Kowalik wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a > lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too. > > I've seen too

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 09:58:00 +0100 Kacper Kowalik wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a > lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too. > > I've se

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Kacper Kowalik
Hi, I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too. I've seen too many bugs reports today that gave me cute, colorful build.logs a