Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH scons-utils] Support setting common SCons arguments using myesconsargs.

2011-10-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:46, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 03:42:24 + Nathan Phillip Brink wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:20:37PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: >> > --- >> >  scons-utils.eclass |   33 + >> >  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+),

[gentoo-dev] Re: Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-24 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:26:01 +0200 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > On 10/24/11 12:58 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > Well not totally on their own, they'd report it and we'd have to see > > what we want to do on an ad hoc basis. > > Fair enough, that's why I suggested to make the hardened spec >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-24 Thread Francesco Riosa
[...] > > Well, in my opinion we could get rid of virtualbox anyway (p.mask it > everywhere), I think it has been tainted in the kernel as crap. > > please do the same for x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers and x11-drivers/ati-drivers

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-24 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/24/11 12:58 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Well not totally on their own, they'd report it and we'd have to see > what we want to do on an ad hoc basis. Fair enough, that's why I suggested to make the hardened spec non-default, so that they have to switch it, and include the info in emerge -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-24 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/24/2011 02:58 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > >> How would we say, >> if you use gcc-config and choose gcc-4.5.1-hardened spec, mask >> gdb-7.0*? I don't think its impossible, but I'm not seeing how to >> proceed right now. > First, I'd like the hardened spec to be non-default, so that if t

[gentoo-dev] Re: Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-24 Thread Duncan
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:58:57 +0200 as excerpted: > Third - can we forcefully disable hardened features in packages that are > not compatible? My assumption is yes, and we should probably print a > warning then. If a warning is to be printed (and I agree that's a good idea

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH scons-utils] Support setting common SCons arguments using myesconsargs.

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 03:42:24 + Nathan Phillip Brink wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:20:37PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > > --- > > scons-utils.eclass | 33 + > > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > ... > > +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: myesconsa