Re: [gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers

2011-10-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 15:40:50 Brian Harring wrote: > Name's a bit off though considering if the host was amd64, `huse amd64` > would return 1 since it's not in IUSE. good point. how about "iuse_use" ? or "use_iuse" ? -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message p

[gentoo-dev] dev-python/pygobject slotting

2011-10-19 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
dev-python/pygobject:3 has been added to gx86 (package.masked for now). It provides only gobject-introspection based bindings ("from gi.repository import GLib"). Per upstream decision, pygobject:2, starting with 2.28.6-r50, will install only "classic" bindings ("import glib"), since its old gi modu

Re: [gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers

2011-10-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:53:07 -0700 Brian Harring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i wrote a new func for toolchain.eclass: huse. this is because the > > toolchain.eclass supports multiple versions in parallel, and the > > IUSE value can vary greatly b

Re: [gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers

2011-10-19 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:26:21PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 19 October 2011 14:53:07 Brian Harring wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > i wrote a new func for toolchain.eclass: huse. this is because the > > > toolchain.eclass supports

Re: [gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers

2011-10-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 14:53:07 Brian Harring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i wrote a new func for toolchain.eclass: huse. this is because the > > toolchain.eclass supports multiple versions in parallel, and the IUSE > > value can vary greatly b

Re: [gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers

2011-10-19 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i wrote a new func for toolchain.eclass: huse. this is because the > toolchain.eclass supports multiple versions in parallel, and the IUSE value > can vary greatly between them. so doing `use foo` without checking IUSE > first

Re: [gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers

2011-10-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 14:05:50 Mike Frysinger wrote: > now that we have "in_iuse" in eutils.eclass (with all the caveats), i'll be > adding huse: > huse() { > in_iuse $1 || return 1 > use $1 > } actually, after posting this, "iuse" is probably a bette

[gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers

2011-10-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
i wrote a new func for toolchain.eclass: huse. this is because the toolchain.eclass supports multiple versions in parallel, and the IUSE value can vary greatly between them. so doing `use foo` without checking IUSE first doesn't work. since i got a request to use this in other eclasses (for t

[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-java/jnlp-bin, app-misc/openjnlp, dev-java/netx

2011-10-19 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 all packages are related to following bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377967 jnlp-bin has been replaced by jnlp-api. openjnlp is obsolete and not needed anymore, also depends on jnlp-bin. netx was a package that we tried to fix the issue,