Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 09/25/2011 06:57 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> But neither portage, nor the portage tree, nor any of our branding are >> shipped with ChromeOS. Hence it's as much a Gentoo install as $company >> that uses portage to build $image for their em

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 21:57:27 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > But neither portage, nor the portage tree, nor any of our branding are > shipped with ChromeOS. Hence it's as much a Gentoo install as $company > that uses portage to build $image for their embedded device, but > doesn't leave any tra

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 09/25/2011 06:57 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Sunday, September 25, 2011 05:53:18 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>> "Gentoo" is defined by portage and the portage tree. If we remove >>> that, the end result is no different than compiling s

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 unmasking

2011-09-25 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:10:13 +0200 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno ven, 23/09/2011 alle 20.38 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto: > > If you have any issues with 4.6 itself or patches you need applied, > > now is > > the time to speak up. > > There should be already a bug open about valgrind: ev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday, September 25, 2011 05:53:18 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> "Gentoo" is defined by portage and the portage tree. If we remove >> that, the end result is no different than compiling stuff manually in >> Slackware or by hand. > > which i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 08:53:08 Rich Freeman wrote: > However, I can't seem to find a chromeos-meta package in portage, and > the fact that my chromeos laptop has some feature does me little good > in getting my Gentoo desktop to do the same. At best ChromeOS is a > fork of Gentoo, and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 05:53:18 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:59, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I'm a bit concerned that the future of linux on the desktop is going to > >> be one where your choices are things like

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2011-09-25 23h59 UTC

2011-09-25 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2011-09-25 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-php5/pecl-id3 2011-09-25 19:13:48 olemarkus Additions: app-vim/threesome 2011-09-19 06:45:50 radhermit app-portage/inst

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 9/25/11 5:53 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Repeat this 100 times and you end up with a chromium tarball > that consists of 90% redistributed 3rd-party libraries with subtle > tweaks. However, can you really argue with Google's success with this > approach. At least in Gentoo we remove _most_ of th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan)

2011-09-25 Thread Corentin Chary
>> Open a bug, attach your ebuilds ( are there any releases besides the >> git code? ) and I will take it from there > > Here it is: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383937 > There are no "released" version, and the project have no homepage > (except http://euscan.iksaif.net). euscan ebuild

[gentoo-dev] last-rite app-misc/ktsuss

2011-09-25 Thread Thomas Kahle
Hi, upstream looks dead and there's a security bug open https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381115 This package can be repaced by gksu or kdesu. Two rdeps are net-misc/wicd, which I'm maintining and app-portage/portato which I bugged. # Thomas Kahle (25 Sep 2011) # Masked for removal in 30

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 unmasking

2011-09-25 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 23/09/2011 alle 20.38 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto: > If you have any issues with 4.6 itself or patches you need applied, > now is > the time to speak up. There should be already a bug open about valgrind: even when _not_ using DWARF-4 (which breaks binutils, btw) the new gcc uses n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:59, Rich Freeman wrote: >> This will be a big challenge for a smaller distro like Gentoo.  Obviously we >> can't just go write our own Wayland replacement, even if we did essentially >> make our own "systemd" of so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr

2011-09-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:59, Rich Freeman wrote: >> I'm a bit concerned that the future of linux on the desktop is going to be >> one where your choices are things like Android, ChromeOS, Ubuntu, Gnome OS, >> or a "KDE OS."  Each one woul