On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> It is a bit hard to document a generic testing process. Each package
> has different requirements. We tried to document a generic workflow in
> amd64 AT[1] and in the AT quiz as well.
Sure, and that's pretty much the method I use, and I im
On 13:37 Wed 21 Sep 2011, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I LIKE the contribution of linux distros, and I don't really want to
> see a move towards the Windows world where I have 10 different
> auto-updaters running (or worse - no auto-update and I'm just stuck
> with manual checks). I also don't like every
since there's been no new feedback in a while, i'll add this to eutils.eclass
in a while:
usex() { use "$1" && echo "${2-yes}$4" || echo "${3-no}$5" ; }
then once it hits the PMS, i'll put EAPI wrapping around it.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/21/11 20:40, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Thomas Kahle
> wrote:
>> Let's have a page in our docs where everybody can explain his or
>> her tool. Where in the hierarchy should the page be? How
>> about: http://www.g
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Let's have a page in our docs where everybody can explain his or her
> tool. Where in the hierarchy should the page be? How about:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/arch-testing
Please! And the documentation should include examples of
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> I agree that these new 'channel' concepts are not very compatible with
> out stable/testing tree model and security stabilizations. Every single
> stabilization (except the first) of www-client/chromium for instance is
> a security stabiliza
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:36:57 Thomas Kahle wrote:
> On 09:10 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote
On 12:10 Wed 21 Sep 2011, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Maybe we need to rethink the definition of "stable" in these
> situations. I think it still doesn't hurt to have some kind of QA
> cycle internally for something like firefox. Plus at least with
> firefox the old versions don't suddenly stop working
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:10:27 -0400 as excerpted:
> Plus at least with firefox the old versions don't suddenly stop
> working/etc, assuming they still get upstream security notices.
That's the thing. AFAIK, they don't. FF4 is still getting them I
believe, due to longer term
On 09:10 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > '$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves. While a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 14:20 Tue 20 Sep , Brian Harring wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:16:46PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> > OK, so the implication of what you're saying is that everything in
>> > eutils.eclass, base.eclass, toolchain-funcs.ecla
Hi!
On 20:42 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/19/11 20:30, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > I uploaded my script for finding reverse dependencies here:
> > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=summary
> >
> > Advantages over existing solutions (browsing to
On 10:30 Mon 19 Sep 2011, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> I uploaded my script for finding reverse dependencies here:
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=summary
app-portage/tatt does that for some time already. It reads the list
from the tinderbox website and then uses
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Talking about... Just today I was reading that the firefox folks are
> debating shortening the current 6-week cycle to 5-weeks or less.
Upstream issues are a whole different kettle of fish, but obviously
still cause problems
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:46:38 -0400 as excerpted:
> An issue your suggestion doesn't address is when packages don't even
> stick around 30 days/etc.
>
> I know I've seen many packages where there is an ancient stable version
> that is never touched, and a much newer ~arch versi
2011/9/20 Tomáš Chvátal :
> The issue here is that if some part of the tree looses lots of its
> maintainers we as devs usually manage to shape it up enough for us in
> testing but nobody ever bothers to wait that 30 days and open
> stablereq.
An issue your suggestion doesn't address is when packa
El mié, 21-09-2011 a las 04:00 +, Duncan escribió:
> Patrick Lauer posted on Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:00:38 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > On 09/20/11 15:09, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > What do you guys think?
> >> I haven't ever tried it but, what would occur if that people with
> >> really updated sys
Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a complete eclass
for convenience.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:32:52 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> 10 -- tries to migrate git.eclass clones to git-2.eclass (#383761).
Fixed invalid output (PVR -> PF).
> 11 -- removes old git.eclass clones to not
On 14:20 Tue 20 Sep , Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:16:46PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > OK, so the implication of what you're saying is that everything in
> > eutils.eclass, base.eclass, toolchain-funcs.eclass,
> > flag-o-matic.eclass, versionator.eclass, multilib.ec
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 09/21/11 11:57, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Donnie Berkholz
>> wrote:
>>> On 10:00 Tue 20 Sep , Corentin Chary wrote:
Could someone write ebui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/21/11 11:57, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Donnie Berkholz
> wrote:
>> On 10:00 Tue 20 Sep , Corentin Chary wrote:
>>> Could someone write ebuilds for euscan and euscanwww ? It
>>> should not take a lot of time,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:46:10 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> 0001 - i had reason to put local definitions on the top, it is way
> more readable to see right away what local vars function has, so
> please stick to it.
> 0007 - I placed it into the conditionals to be clear what is
> happening, what if
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 10:00 Tue 20 Sep , Corentin Chary wrote:
>> Could someone write ebuilds for euscan and euscanwww ? It should not
>> take a lot of time, but my ebuilds skills are probably not good
>> enought to do that.
>
> Sounds like good practice
23 matches
Mail list logo
