# Matt Turner
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:27:27 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on top
> of / before init is and has been broken with udev for a long time
> now[1][2][3]
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364235
> [2] http://fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:28:51PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:26:56 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > Aka, ebuild's should be written to assume the files they install get
> > wiped; there is *zero* mention of mtime, nor could any ebuild rely on
> > it and be compliant.
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:26:56 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> Aka, ebuild's should be written to assume the files they install get
> wiped; there is *zero* mention of mtime, nor could any ebuild rely on
> it and be compliant.
But as it's a FEATURE, they can't assume that at all.
So either we spec V
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:34:21PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:29:29 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > That's not a "massive change" to vdb behaviour either; file
> > collisions aren't supposed to occur, as such ownership of the file is
> > basically guranteed back to a si
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:38:10 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 07:37 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > I'm more or less alone in the ml herd (maintainer) and I don't use
> > unison :(
>
> While you mention the herd: how come this is herd=ml?
because it's written in ocaml
On 08/03/2011 07:37 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> I'm more or less alone in the ml herd (maintainer) and I don't use
> unison :(
While you mention the herd: how come this is herd=ml?
Best,
Sebastian
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:20:18 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> Version in Gentoo: 2.32.52
> Version upstream: 2.40.63
>
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353282
>
> The bug is old enough to justify a takeover to me, provided you act
> with resonable care.
+1
I'm more
Hello!
Version in Gentoo: 2.32.52
Version upstream: 2.40.63
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353282
The bug is old enough to justify a takeover to me, provided you act with
resonable care.
Sebastian
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:27:23 +0200
> "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" wrote:
>
>> El 03/08/11 06:57, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
>> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo
>> > Riera (klondike) wrote:
>>
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> A good moderation would be to require PGP signatures as well but I
> guess many devs still don't do that.
Most MUAs don't support pgp signatures. I used to use them until
being able to compose emails from Android and ChromeOS with full
folde
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:27:23 +0200
"Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" wrote:
> El 03/08/11 06:57, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo
> > Riera (klondike) wrote:
> >> Come on they can't be serious... this won't work against Ge
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:29:29 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:36:12 -0400
> > Jonathan Callen wrote:
> > > That statement needs one more qualification: "and doesn't use
> > > portage". Portage will (by default)
13 matches
Mail list logo
