On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:27 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
> >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >>
> >>> So go claim your commits,
> >>
> >> Great wo
On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
>> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>>
>>> So go claim your commits,
>>
>> Great work!
>>
>>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
>>> [2]
>>> http://git-exp.ov
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
> > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >
> >> So go claim your commits,
> >
> > Great work!
> >
> >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
> >> [
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> So go claim your commits,
>
> Great work!
>
>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
>> [2]
>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
>
>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> So go claim your commits,
Great work!
> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
> [2]
> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest
commi
# Pacho Ramos (25 Jul 2011)
# Old and unmaintained for a long time, bug #358587.
# Removal in 30 days
=dev-libs/libsigc++-1.0*
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Pacho Ramos (25 Jul 2011)
# No new release since 2002, doesn't respect LDFLAGS and
# still needing old libsigc++:1.0. Removal in 30 days. (#358589)
net-libs/libicq2000
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
